提交 bef5767f 编写于 作者: Y Yuchung Cheng 提交者: David S. Miller

tcp: better delivery accounting for SYN-ACK and SYN-data

the tcp_sock:delivered has inconsistent accounting for SYN and FIN.
1. it counts pure FIN
2. it counts pure SYN
3. it counts SYN-data twice
4. it does not count SYN-ACK

For congestion control perspective it does not matter much as C.C. only
cares about the difference not the aboslute value. But the next patch
would export this field to user-space so it's better to report the absolute
value w/o these caveats.

This patch counts SYN, SYN-ACK, or SYN-data delivery once always in
the "delivered" field.
Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 415787d7
......@@ -5567,9 +5567,12 @@ static bool tcp_rcv_fastopen_synack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *synack,
return true;
}
tp->syn_data_acked = tp->syn_data;
if (tp->syn_data_acked)
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk),
LINUX_MIB_TCPFASTOPENACTIVE);
if (tp->syn_data_acked) {
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPFASTOPENACTIVE);
/* SYN-data is counted as two separate packets in tcp_ack() */
if (tp->delivered > 1)
--tp->delivered;
}
tcp_fastopen_add_skb(sk, synack);
......@@ -5901,6 +5904,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
switch (sk->sk_state) {
case TCP_SYN_RECV:
tp->delivered++; /* SYN-ACK delivery isn't tracked in tcp_ack */
if (!tp->srtt_us)
tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, req);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册