提交 bca2b916 编写于 作者: Y Yijing Wang 提交者: Joerg Roedel

iommu/vt-d: Use list_for_each_entry_safe() for dmar_domain->devices traversal

Replace list_for_each_safe() + list_entry() with the simpler
list_for_each_entry_safe().
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
上级 8b161f0e
......@@ -3781,11 +3781,10 @@ static void iommu_detach_dependent_devices(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
struct device_domain_info *info, *tmp;
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
unsigned long flags;
int found = 0;
struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
iommu = device_to_iommu(pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number,
pdev->devfn);
......@@ -3793,8 +3792,7 @@ static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &domain->devices) {
info = list_entry(entry, struct device_domain_info, link);
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, tmp, &domain->devices, link) {
if (info->segment == pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) &&
info->bus == pdev->bus->number &&
info->devfn == pdev->devfn) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册