提交 bc321ed2 编写于 作者: D David S. Miller

Merge branch 'mlx4'

Or Gerlitz says:

====================
mlx4 fixes for 4.1-rc2

Eran's fix is for a small off-by-one introduces on 4.1-rc1.

Yisahi fixes an issue with comes into play only on VMs with
many (> 256) vCPUs.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
...@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned long en_stats_adder(__be64 *start, __be64 *next, int num) ...@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned long en_stats_adder(__be64 *start, __be64 *next, int num)
int i; int i;
int offset = next - start; int offset = next - start;
for (i = 0; i <= num; i++) { for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
ret += be64_to_cpu(*curr); ret += be64_to_cpu(*curr);
curr += offset; curr += offset;
} }
......
...@@ -2845,7 +2845,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, ...@@ -2845,7 +2845,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
{ {
int err; int err;
int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier; int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
int res_id = (slave << 8) | eqn; int res_id = (slave << 10) | eqn;
struct mlx4_eq_context *eqc = inbox->buf; struct mlx4_eq_context *eqc = inbox->buf;
int mtt_base = eq_get_mtt_addr(eqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz; int mtt_base = eq_get_mtt_addr(eqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz;
int mtt_size = eq_get_mtt_size(eqc); int mtt_size = eq_get_mtt_size(eqc);
...@@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, ...@@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
struct mlx4_cmd_info *cmd) struct mlx4_cmd_info *cmd)
{ {
int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier; int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
int res_id = eqn | (slave << 8); int res_id = eqn | (slave << 10);
struct res_eq *eq; struct res_eq *eq;
int err; int err;
...@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ int mlx4_GEN_EQE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, struct mlx4_eqe *eqe) ...@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ int mlx4_GEN_EQE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, struct mlx4_eqe *eqe)
return 0; return 0;
mutex_lock(&priv->mfunc.master.gen_eqe_mutex[slave]); mutex_lock(&priv->mfunc.master.gen_eqe_mutex[slave]);
res_id = (slave << 8) | event_eq->eqn; res_id = (slave << 10) | event_eq->eqn;
err = get_res(dev, slave, res_id, RES_EQ, &req); err = get_res(dev, slave, res_id, RES_EQ, &req);
if (err) if (err)
goto unlock; goto unlock;
...@@ -3131,7 +3131,7 @@ int mlx4_GEN_EQE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, struct mlx4_eqe *eqe) ...@@ -3131,7 +3131,7 @@ int mlx4_GEN_EQE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, struct mlx4_eqe *eqe)
memcpy(mailbox->buf, (u8 *) eqe, 28); memcpy(mailbox->buf, (u8 *) eqe, 28);
in_modifier = (slave & 0xff) | ((event_eq->eqn & 0xff) << 16); in_modifier = (slave & 0xff) | ((event_eq->eqn & 0x3ff) << 16);
err = mlx4_cmd(dev, mailbox->dma, in_modifier, 0, err = mlx4_cmd(dev, mailbox->dma, in_modifier, 0,
MLX4_CMD_GEN_EQE, MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_B, MLX4_CMD_GEN_EQE, MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_B,
...@@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ int mlx4_QUERY_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, ...@@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ int mlx4_QUERY_EQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
struct mlx4_cmd_info *cmd) struct mlx4_cmd_info *cmd)
{ {
int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier; int eqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
int res_id = eqn | (slave << 8); int res_id = eqn | (slave << 10);
struct res_eq *eq; struct res_eq *eq;
int err; int err;
...@@ -4714,13 +4714,13 @@ static void rem_slave_eqs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave) ...@@ -4714,13 +4714,13 @@ static void rem_slave_eqs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
break; break;
case RES_EQ_HW: case RES_EQ_HW:
err = mlx4_cmd(dev, slave, eqn & 0xff, err = mlx4_cmd(dev, slave, eqn & 0x3ff,
1, MLX4_CMD_HW2SW_EQ, 1, MLX4_CMD_HW2SW_EQ,
MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_A, MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_A,
MLX4_CMD_NATIVE); MLX4_CMD_NATIVE);
if (err) if (err)
mlx4_dbg(dev, "rem_slave_eqs: failed to move slave %d eqs %d to SW ownership\n", mlx4_dbg(dev, "rem_slave_eqs: failed to move slave %d eqs %d to SW ownership\n",
slave, eqn); slave, eqn & 0x3ff);
atomic_dec(&eq->mtt->ref_count); atomic_dec(&eq->mtt->ref_count);
state = RES_EQ_RESERVED; state = RES_EQ_RESERVED;
break; break;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册