提交 b884a2ec 编写于 作者: E Eric Yang 提交者: Alex Deucher

drm/amd/display: call pplib to update clocks

Allow pplib to update fclk and dcfclk for different voltage levels.
PPlib's values for dispclk and phyclk is not correct, so we are not
getting it from them. fclk is currently not used correctly, although
does not effect the actual fclk we request.
Signed-off-by: NEric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NTony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: NHarry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
上级 133e8e1b
......@@ -1226,28 +1226,13 @@ unsigned int dcn_find_dcfclk_suits_all(
void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct core_dc *dc)
{
struct dc_context *ctx = dc->ctx;
struct dm_pp_clock_levels_with_latency clks = {0};
struct dm_pp_clock_levels_with_voltage clks2 = {0};
struct dm_pp_clock_levels_with_voltage clks = {0};
kernel_fpu_begin();
/* TODO: This is not the proper way to obtain fabric_and_dram_bandwidth, should be min(fclk, memclk) */
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_voltage(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_DISPLAY_CLK, &clks2) &&
clks2.num_levels >= 3) {
dc->dcn_soc.max_dispclk_vmin0p65 = clks2.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dispclk_vmid0p72 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 3].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dispclk_vnom0p8 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 2].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dispclk_vmax0p9 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
/*
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_latency(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_MEMORY_CLK, &clks) &&
clks.num_levels != 0) {
//this is to get DRAM data_rate
//FabricAndDRAMBandwidth = min(64*FCLK , Data rate * single_Channel_Width * number of channels);
}*/
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_latency(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_FCLK, &clks) &&
clks.num_levels != 0) {
ASSERT(clks.num_levels >= 3);
......@@ -1265,7 +1250,7 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct core_dc *dc)
(clks.data[clks.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) * ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_latency(
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_voltage(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_DCFCLK, &clks) &&
clks.num_levels >= 3) {
dc->dcn_soc.dcfclkv_min0p65 = clks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
......@@ -1274,30 +1259,7 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct core_dc *dc)
dc->dcn_soc.dcfclkv_max0p9 = clks.data[clks.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_voltage(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_DISPLAYPHYCLK, &clks2) &&
clks2.num_levels >= 3) {
dc->dcn_soc.phyclkv_min0p65 = clks2.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.phyclkv_mid0p72 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 3].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.phyclkv_nom0p8 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 2].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.phyclkv_max0p9 = clks2.data[clks2.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_latency(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_DPPCLK, &clks) &&
clks.num_levels >= 3) {
dc->dcn_soc.max_dppclk_vmin0p65 = clks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dppclk_vmid0p72 = clks.data[clks.num_levels - 3].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dppclk_vnom0p8 = clks.data[clks.num_levels - 2].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
dc->dcn_soc.max_dppclk_vmax0p9 = clks.data[clks.num_levels - 1].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
}
if (dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type_with_latency(
ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_SOCCLK, &clks) &&
clks.num_levels >= 3) {
dc->dcn_soc.socclk = clks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0;
} else
BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER();
kernel_fpu_end();
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册