提交 b8273570 编写于 作者: J Johannes Berg 提交者: David S. Miller

genetlink: fix netns vs. netlink table locking (2)

Similar to commit d136f1bd,
there's a bug when unregistering a generic netlink family,
which is caught by the might_sleep() added in that commit:

    BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:183
    in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1510, name: rmmod
    2 locks held by rmmod/1510:
     #0:  (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8138283b>] genl_unregister_family+0x2b/0x130
     #1:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8138270c>] __genl_unregister_mc_group+0x1c/0x120
    Pid: 1510, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.31-wl #444
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff81044ff9>] __might_sleep+0x119/0x150
     [<ffffffff81380501>] netlink_table_grab+0x21/0x100
     [<ffffffff813813a3>] netlink_clear_multicast_users+0x23/0x60
     [<ffffffff81382761>] __genl_unregister_mc_group+0x71/0x120
     [<ffffffff81382866>] genl_unregister_family+0x56/0x130
     [<ffffffffa0007d85>] nl80211_exit+0x15/0x20 [cfg80211]
     [<ffffffffa000005a>] cfg80211_exit+0x1a/0x40 [cfg80211]

Fix in the same way by grabbing the netlink table lock
before doing rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 704cc92e
......@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(struct net *net,
extern void netlink_kernel_release(struct sock *sk);
extern int __netlink_change_ngroups(struct sock *sk, unsigned int groups);
extern int netlink_change_ngroups(struct sock *sk, unsigned int groups);
extern void __netlink_clear_multicast_users(struct sock *sk, unsigned int group);
extern void netlink_clear_multicast_users(struct sock *sk, unsigned int group);
extern void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err);
extern int netlink_has_listeners(struct sock *sk, unsigned int group);
......
......@@ -1609,6 +1609,16 @@ int netlink_change_ngroups(struct sock *sk, unsigned int groups)
return err;
}
void __netlink_clear_multicast_users(struct sock *ksk, unsigned int group)
{
struct sock *sk;
struct hlist_node *node;
struct netlink_table *tbl = &nl_table[ksk->sk_protocol];
sk_for_each_bound(sk, node, &tbl->mc_list)
netlink_update_socket_mc(nlk_sk(sk), group, 0);
}
/**
* netlink_clear_multicast_users - kick off multicast listeners
*
......@@ -1619,15 +1629,8 @@ int netlink_change_ngroups(struct sock *sk, unsigned int groups)
*/
void netlink_clear_multicast_users(struct sock *ksk, unsigned int group)
{
struct sock *sk;
struct hlist_node *node;
struct netlink_table *tbl = &nl_table[ksk->sk_protocol];
netlink_table_grab();
sk_for_each_bound(sk, node, &tbl->mc_list)
netlink_update_socket_mc(nlk_sk(sk), group, 0);
__netlink_clear_multicast_users(ksk, group);
netlink_table_ungrab();
}
......
......@@ -220,10 +220,12 @@ static void __genl_unregister_mc_group(struct genl_family *family,
struct net *net;
BUG_ON(grp->family != family);
netlink_table_grab();
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_net_rcu(net)
netlink_clear_multicast_users(net->genl_sock, grp->id);
__netlink_clear_multicast_users(net->genl_sock, grp->id);
rcu_read_unlock();
netlink_table_ungrab();
clear_bit(grp->id, mc_groups);
list_del(&grp->list);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册