提交 b757730b 编写于 作者: A Andy Walls 提交者: Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] lirc_zilog: Update IR Rx polling kthread start/stop and some printks

The IR Rx polling thread was originally a kernel_thread long ago,
and had only been minimally converted to a kthread.  This patch
finishes that conversion by

- cleaning up all the unneeded completions

- destroying the kthread properly by calling kthread_stop()

- changing lirc_thread() to test kthread_should_stop() just before
	every point where it may sleep

- reorganizing the lirc_thread() function so it uses fewer lines

- modifying the name of the kthread from "lirc_zilog" to
	"zilog-rx-i2c-N", so ps will show which kthread polls
	which Zilog Z8 IR unit.

Also some minor tweaks were made to logging emitted by the
ir_probe() function.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
上级 a68a9b73
......@@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ struct IR_rx {
struct mutex buf_lock;
/* RX polling thread data */
struct completion *t_notify;
struct completion *t_notify2;
int shutdown;
struct task_struct *task;
/* RX read data */
......@@ -171,12 +168,20 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
* data and we have space
*/
do {
if (kthread_should_stop())
return -ENODATA;
/*
* Lock i2c bus for the duration. RX/TX chips interfere so
* this is worth it
*/
mutex_lock(&ir->ir_lock);
if (kthread_should_stop()) {
mutex_unlock(&ir->ir_lock);
return -ENODATA;
}
/*
* Send random "poll command" (?) Windows driver does this
* and it is a good point to detect chip failure.
......@@ -196,6 +201,10 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
"trying reset\n");
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (kthread_should_stop()) {
mutex_unlock(&ir->ir_lock);
return -ENODATA;
}
schedule_timeout((100 * HZ + 999) / 1000);
if (ir->tx != NULL)
ir->tx->need_boot = 1;
......@@ -205,6 +214,10 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
continue;
}
if (kthread_should_stop()) {
mutex_unlock(&ir->ir_lock);
return -ENODATA;
}
ret = i2c_master_recv(rx->c, keybuf, sizeof(keybuf));
mutex_unlock(&ir->ir_lock);
if (ret != sizeof(keybuf)) {
......@@ -255,48 +268,35 @@ static int lirc_thread(void *arg)
struct IR *ir = arg;
struct IR_rx *rx = ir->rx;
if (rx->t_notify != NULL)
complete(rx->t_notify);
dprintk("poll thread started\n");
do {
if (ir->open) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/*
* This is ~113*2 + 24 + jitter (2*repeat gap +
* code length). We use this interval as the chip
* resets every time you poll it (bad!). This is
* therefore just sufficient to catch all of the
* button presses. It makes the remote much more
* responsive. You can see the difference by
* running irw and holding down a button. With
* 100ms, the old polling interval, you'll notice
* breaks in the repeat sequence corresponding to
* lost keypresses.
*/
schedule_timeout((260 * HZ) / 1000);
if (rx->shutdown)
break;
if (!add_to_buf(ir))
wake_up_interruptible(&rx->buf.wait_poll);
} else {
/* if device not opened so we can sleep half a second */
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/* if device not opened, we can sleep half a second */
if (!ir->open) {
schedule_timeout(HZ/2);
continue;
}
} while (!rx->shutdown);
if (rx->t_notify2 != NULL)
wait_for_completion(rx->t_notify2);
rx->task = NULL;
if (rx->t_notify != NULL)
complete(rx->t_notify);
/*
* This is ~113*2 + 24 + jitter (2*repeat gap + code length).
* We use this interval as the chip resets every time you poll
* it (bad!). This is therefore just sufficient to catch all
* of the button presses. It makes the remote much more
* responsive. You can see the difference by running irw and
* holding down a button. With 100ms, the old polling
* interval, you'll notice breaks in the repeat sequence
* corresponding to lost keypresses.
*/
schedule_timeout((260 * HZ) / 1000);
if (kthread_should_stop())
break;
if (!add_to_buf(ir))
wake_up_interruptible(&rx->buf.wait_poll);
}
dprintk("poll thread ended\n");
/* FIXME - investigate if this is the proper way to shutdown a kthread*/
return 0;
}
......@@ -1169,25 +1169,12 @@ static const struct file_operations lirc_fops = {
.release = close
};
/* FIXME - investigate if this is the proper way to shutdown a kthread */
static void destroy_rx_kthread(struct IR_rx *rx)
{
DECLARE_COMPLETION(tn);
DECLARE_COMPLETION(tn2);
if (rx == NULL)
return;
/* end up polling thread */
if (rx->task && !IS_ERR(rx->task)) {
rx->t_notify = &tn;
rx->t_notify2 = &tn2;
rx->shutdown = 1;
wake_up_process(rx->task);
complete(&tn2);
wait_for_completion(&tn);
rx->t_notify = NULL;
rx->t_notify2 = NULL;
if (rx != NULL && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rx->task)) {
kthread_stop(rx->task);
rx->task = NULL;
}
}
......@@ -1290,8 +1277,8 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
else if (tx_only) /* module option */
return -ENXIO;
zilog_info("%s: probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d)\n",
__func__, tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr);
zilog_info("probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d)\n",
tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr);
mutex_lock(&ir_devices_lock);
......@@ -1360,27 +1347,23 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
/* Proceed only if we have the required Tx and Rx clients ready to go */
if (ir->tx == NULL ||
(ir->rx == NULL && !tx_only)) {
zilog_info("%s: probe of IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) done, waiting on "
"IR %s\n", __func__, tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx",
adap->name, adap->nr, tx_probe ? "Rx" : "Tx");
zilog_info("probe of IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) done. Waiting on "
"IR %s.\n", tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name,
adap->nr, tx_probe ? "Rx" : "Tx");
goto out_ok;
}
/* initialise RX device */
if (ir->rx != NULL) {
DECLARE_COMPLETION(tn);
/* try to fire up polling thread */
ir->rx->t_notify = &tn;
ir->rx->task = kthread_run(lirc_thread, ir, "lirc_zilog");
ir->rx->task = kthread_run(lirc_thread, ir,
"zilog-rx-i2c-%d", adap->nr);
if (IS_ERR(ir->rx->task)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(ir->rx->task);
zilog_error("%s: could not start IR Rx polling thread"
"\n", __func__);
goto out_free_xx;
}
wait_for_completion(&tn);
ir->rx->t_notify = NULL;
}
/* register with lirc */
......@@ -1404,6 +1387,8 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
goto out_unregister;
}
zilog_info("probe of IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) done. IR unit ready.\n",
tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr);
out_ok:
mutex_unlock(&ir_devices_lock);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册