提交 b6aeddea 编写于 作者: M Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Fix stack protector crashes on CPU hotplug

Recently in commit 7241d26e ("powerpc/64: properly initialise
the stackprotector canary on SMP.") we fixed a crash with stack
protector on SMP by initialising the stack canary in
cpu_idle_thread_init().

But this can also causes crashes, when a CPU comes back online after
being offline:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x2a0/0x2b0
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc3-gcc-7.3.1-00168-g4ffe713b #94
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0xb0/0xf4 (unreliable)
    panic+0x144/0x328
    __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x30
    pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x2a0/0x2b0
    cpu_die+0x48/0x70
    arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x20/0x40
    do_idle+0x274/0x390
    cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x50
    start_secondary+0x5e4/0x600
    start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14

Looking at the stack we see that the canary value in the stack frame
doesn't match the canary in the task/paca. That is because we have
reinitialised the task/paca value, but then the CPU coming online has
returned into a function using the old canary value. That causes the
comparison to fail.

Instead we can call boot_init_stack_canary() from start_secondary()
which never returns. This is essentially what the generic code does in
cpu_startup_entry() under #ifdef X86, we should make that non-x86
specific in a future patch.

Fixes: 7241d26e ("powerpc/64: properly initialise the stackprotector canary on SMP.")
Reported-by: NJoel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: NChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
上级 daf00ae7
...@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ ...@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <linux/profile.h> #include <linux/profile.h>
#include <linux/processor.h> #include <linux/processor.h>
#include <linux/random.h> #include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/atomic.h>
...@@ -1014,16 +1015,9 @@ static void cpu_idle_thread_init(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) ...@@ -1014,16 +1015,9 @@ static void cpu_idle_thread_init(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
{ {
struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(idle); struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(idle);
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
idle->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
paca_ptrs[cpu]->__current = idle; paca_ptrs[cpu]->__current = idle;
paca_ptrs[cpu]->kstack = (unsigned long)ti + THREAD_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD; paca_ptrs[cpu]->kstack = (unsigned long)ti + THREAD_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD;
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
paca_ptrs[cpu]->canary = idle->stack_canary;
#endif
#endif #endif
ti->cpu = cpu; ti->cpu = cpu;
secondary_ti = current_set[cpu] = ti; secondary_ti = current_set[cpu] = ti;
...@@ -1316,6 +1310,8 @@ void start_secondary(void *unused) ...@@ -1316,6 +1310,8 @@ void start_secondary(void *unused)
notify_cpu_starting(cpu); notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
set_cpu_online(cpu, true); set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
boot_init_stack_canary();
local_irq_enable(); local_irq_enable();
/* We can enable ftrace for secondary cpus now */ /* We can enable ftrace for secondary cpus now */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册