提交 b55886e8 编写于 作者: R Ren Zhijie 提交者: Zhong Jinghua

sched: programmable: fix build error of bpf_topology

hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I645C7
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

make ARCH="arm64" CROSS_COMPILE="aarch64-linux-gnu-",
gcc complained as follow:

In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h:17:0,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h:5,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:1025,
                 from ./include/linux/gfp.h:6,
                 from ./include/linux/umh.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9,
                 from ./include/linux/module.h:16,
                 from ./include/linux/bpf.h:20,
                 from kernel/sched/bpf_topology.c:15:
kernel/sched/bpf_topology.c: In function ‘bpf_update_cpu_topology’:
./include/linux/arch_topology.h:64:62: error: ‘struct bpf_cpu_topology’ has no member named ‘package_id’; did you mean ‘package_cpus’?
 #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].package_id)

kernel/sched/bpf_topology.c:57:20: warning: ‘bpf_cpu_topology_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
 BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_cpu_topology_ids, struct, bpf_cpu_topology)

To fix this error, change local variable cpu_topology to bpf_cpu_topology and
delete the definition of bpf_cpu_topology_ids.

Fixes: f333bd68 ("sched: programmable: Add helper function for...")
Signed-off-by: NRen Zhijie <renzhijie2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NHui Tang <tanghui20@huawei.com>
上级 09ebbfe0
......@@ -20,20 +20,20 @@
#include <linux/bpf_topology.h>
#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
static void bpf_update_cpu_topology(struct bpf_cpu_topology *cpu_topology, int cpu)
static void bpf_update_cpu_topology(struct bpf_cpu_topology *bpf_cpu_topology, int cpu)
{
cpu_topology->cpu = cpu;
cpu_topology->core_id = topology_core_id(cpu);
cpu_topology->cluster_id = topology_cluster_id(cpu);
cpu_topology->die_id = topology_die_id(cpu);
cpu_topology->physical_package_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
cpu_topology->numa_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->thread_siblings, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->core_siblings, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->cluster_cpus, topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->die_cpus, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->package_cpus, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&cpu_topology->node_cpu_lists, cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)));
bpf_cpu_topology->cpu = cpu;
bpf_cpu_topology->core_id = topology_core_id(cpu);
bpf_cpu_topology->cluster_id = topology_cluster_id(cpu);
bpf_cpu_topology->die_id = topology_die_id(cpu);
bpf_cpu_topology->physical_package_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
bpf_cpu_topology->numa_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->thread_siblings, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->core_siblings, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->cluster_cpus, topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->die_cpus, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->package_cpus, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_copy(&bpf_cpu_topology->node_cpu_lists, cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)));
}
BPF_CALL_1(bpf_init_cpu_topology, struct bpf_map *, map)
......@@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_init_cpu_topology, struct bpf_map *, map)
return 0;
}
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_cpu_topology_ids, struct, bpf_cpu_topology)
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_init_cpu_topology_proto = {
.func = bpf_init_cpu_topology,
.gpl_only = false,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册