perf trace: Sort syscalls stats by msecs in --summary

  # trace -a -s sleep 1
  <SNIP>
   Xorg (1965), 788 events, 19.0%, 0.000 msec

     syscall            calls    total       min       avg       max      stddev
                                 (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     select                89   731.038     0.000     8.214   175.218     36.71%
     ioctl                 22     0.661     0.010     0.030     0.072     10.43%
     writev                42     0.253     0.002     0.006     0.011      5.94%
     recvmsg               60     0.185     0.001     0.003     0.009      5.90%
     setitimer             60     0.127     0.001     0.002     0.006      6.14%
     read                  52     0.102     0.001     0.002     0.005      8.55%
     rt_sigprocmask        45     0.092     0.001     0.002     0.023     23.65%
     poll                  12     0.021     0.001     0.002     0.003      7.21%
     epoll_wait            12     0.019     0.001     0.002     0.002      2.71%

   firefox (10871), 1080 events, 26.1%, 0.000 msec

     syscall            calls    total       min       avg       max      stddev
                                 (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     poll                 240   979.562     0.000     4.082    17.132     11.33%
     recvmsg              240     0.532     0.001     0.002     0.007      3.69%
     read                  60     0.303     0.003     0.005     0.029      8.50%
Suggested-by: NMilian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-52kdkuyxihq0kvc0n2aalhay@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
上级 96c14451
......@@ -2785,15 +2785,29 @@ static size_t trace__fprintf_threads_header(FILE *fp)
return printed;
}
DEFINE_RESORT_RB(syscall_stats, a->msecs > b->msecs,
struct stats *stats;
double msecs;
int syscall;
)
{
struct int_node *source = rb_entry(nd, struct int_node, rb_node);
struct stats *stats = source->priv;
entry->syscall = source->i;
entry->stats = stats;
entry->msecs = stats ? (u64)stats->n * (avg_stats(stats) / NSEC_PER_MSEC) : 0;
}
static size_t thread__dump_stats(struct thread_trace *ttrace,
struct trace *trace, FILE *fp)
{
struct stats *stats;
size_t printed = 0;
struct syscall *sc;
struct int_node *inode = intlist__first(ttrace->syscall_stats);
struct rb_node *nd;
DECLARE_RESORT_RB_INTLIST(syscall_stats, ttrace->syscall_stats);
if (inode == NULL)
if (syscall_stats == NULL)
return 0;
printed += fprintf(fp, "\n");
......@@ -2802,9 +2816,8 @@ static size_t thread__dump_stats(struct thread_trace *ttrace,
printed += fprintf(fp, " (msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%%)\n");
printed += fprintf(fp, " --------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------\n");
/* each int_node is a syscall */
while (inode) {
stats = inode->priv;
resort_rb__for_each(nd, syscall_stats) {
struct stats *stats = syscall_stats_entry->stats;
if (stats) {
double min = (double)(stats->min) / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
double max = (double)(stats->max) / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
......@@ -2815,16 +2828,15 @@ static size_t thread__dump_stats(struct thread_trace *ttrace,
pct = avg ? 100.0 * stddev_stats(stats)/avg : 0.0;
avg /= NSEC_PER_MSEC;
sc = &trace->syscalls.table[inode->i];
sc = &trace->syscalls.table[syscall_stats_entry->syscall];
printed += fprintf(fp, " %-15s", sc->name);
printed += fprintf(fp, " %8" PRIu64 " %9.3f %9.3f %9.3f",
n, avg * n, min, avg);
n, syscall_stats_entry->msecs, min, avg);
printed += fprintf(fp, " %9.3f %9.2f%%\n", max, pct);
}
inode = intlist__next(inode);
}
resort_rb__delete(syscall_stats);
printed += fprintf(fp, "\n\n");
return printed;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册