提交 b50c259e 编写于 作者: N NeilBrown

md/raid10: fix two bugs in handling of known-bad-blocks.

If we discover a bad block when reading we split the request and
potentially read some of it from a different device.

The code path of this has two bugs in RAID10.
1/ we get a spin_lock with _irq, but unlock without _irq!!
2/ The calculation of 'sectors_handled' is wrong, as can be clearly
   seen by comparison with raid1.c

This leads to at least 2 warnings and a probable crash is a RAID10
ever had known bad blocks.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v3.1+)
Fixes: 856e08e2Reported-by: NDamian Nowak <spam@nowaker.net>
URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68181Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
上级 1cc03eb9
......@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bio)
/* Could not read all from this device, so we will
* need another r10_bio.
*/
sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sectors + max_sectors
sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sector + max_sectors
- bio->bi_sector);
r10_bio->sectors = max_sectors;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
......@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bio)
bio->bi_phys_segments = 2;
else
bio->bi_phys_segments++;
spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
/* Cannot call generic_make_request directly
* as that will be queued in __generic_make_request
* and subsequent mempool_alloc might block
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册