提交 b49a821e 编写于 作者: J Jin Yao 提交者: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

  perf record -b -g <command>
  perf report --branch-history

This merges the LBRs with the callgraphs.

However it would be nice if it also works without callgraphs (-g) set in
perf record, so that only the LBRs are displayed.  But currently perf
report errors in this case. For example,

  perf record -b <command>
  perf report --branch-history

  Error:
  Selected -g or --branch-history but no callchain data. Did
  you call 'perf record' without -g?

This patch displays the LBRs only even if callgraphs(-g) is not enabled
in perf record.

Change log:

v2: According to Milian Wolff's comment, change the obsolete error
message. Now the error message is:

                 ┌─Error:─────────────────────────────────────┐
                 │Selected -g or --branch-history.            │
                 │But no callchain or branch data.            │
                 │Did you call 'perf record' without -g or -b?│
                 │                                            │
                 │                                            │
                 │Press any key...                            │
                 └────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When passing the last parameter to hists__fprintf,
changes "|" to "||".

  hists__fprintf(hists, !quiet, 0, 0, rep->min_percent, stdout,
                 symbol_conf.use_callchain || symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count);
Signed-off-by: NYao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1494240182-28899-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
上级 a6418605
......@@ -279,10 +279,11 @@ static int report__setup_sample_type(struct report *rep)
"'perf record' without -g?\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (symbol_conf.use_callchain) {
ui__error("Selected -g or --branch-history but no "
"callchain data. Did\n"
"you call 'perf record' without -g?\n");
if (symbol_conf.use_callchain &&
!symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count) {
ui__error("Selected -g or --branch-history.\n"
"But no callchain or branch data.\n"
"Did you call 'perf record' without -g or -b?\n");
return -1;
}
} else if (!callchain_param.enabled &&
......@@ -417,7 +418,8 @@ static int perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
hists__fprintf_nr_sample_events(hists, rep, evname, stdout);
hists__fprintf(hists, !quiet, 0, 0, rep->min_percent, stdout,
symbol_conf.use_callchain);
symbol_conf.use_callchain ||
symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count);
fprintf(stdout, "\n\n");
}
......
......@@ -1010,11 +1010,11 @@ int sample__resolve_callchain(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct addr_location *al,
int max_stack)
{
if (sample->callchain == NULL)
if (sample->callchain == NULL && !symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count)
return 0;
if (symbol_conf.use_callchain || symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain ||
perf_hpp_list.parent) {
perf_hpp_list.parent || symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count) {
return thread__resolve_callchain(al->thread, cursor, evsel, sample,
parent, al, max_stack);
}
......@@ -1023,7 +1023,8 @@ int sample__resolve_callchain(struct perf_sample *sample,
int hist_entry__append_callchain(struct hist_entry *he, struct perf_sample *sample)
{
if (!symbol_conf.use_callchain || sample->callchain == NULL)
if ((!symbol_conf.use_callchain || sample->callchain == NULL) &&
!symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count)
return 0;
return callchain_append(he->callchain, &callchain_cursor, sample->period);
}
......
......@@ -1759,6 +1759,8 @@ void perf_evsel__output_resort(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct ui_progress *pro
else
use_callchain = symbol_conf.use_callchain;
use_callchain |= symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count;
output_resort(evsel__hists(evsel), prog, use_callchain, NULL);
}
......
......@@ -1902,13 +1902,16 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
{
struct branch_stack *branch = sample->branch_stack;
struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
int chain_nr = chain->nr;
int chain_nr = 0;
u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
int i, j, err, nr_entries;
int skip_idx = -1;
int first_call = 0;
int nr_loop_iter;
if (chain)
chain_nr = chain->nr;
if (perf_evsel__has_branch_callstack(evsel)) {
err = resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(thread, cursor, sample, parent,
root_al, max_stack);
......@@ -1946,6 +1949,10 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
be[i] = branch->entries[i];
if (chain == NULL)
continue;
/*
* Check for overlap into the callchain.
* The return address is one off compared to
......@@ -2000,6 +2007,10 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
if (err)
return err;
}
if (chain_nr == 0)
return 0;
chain_nr -= nr;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册