io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.12
commit 7bccd1c19128140b9fefaa43808924c6932bef5b
bugzilla: 47876

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 4aa84f2f ]

      CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&new->fa_lock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
                               lock(&new->fa_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&ctx->completion_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Move kill_fasync() out of io_commit_cqring() to io_cqring_ev_posted(),
so it doesn't hold completion_lock while doing it. That saves from the
reported deadlock, and it's just nice to shorten the locking time and
untangle nested locks (compl_lock -> wq_head::lock).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+
Reported-by: syzbot+91ca3f25bd7f795f019c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

fs/io_uring.c

@@ -1214,11 +1214,6 @@ static void __io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 
 	/* order cqe stores with ring update */
 	smp_store_release(&rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
-
-	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
-		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
-		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
-	}
 }
 
 static void io_put_identity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1604,6 +1599,10 @@ static inline bool io_should_trigger_evfd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 
 static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
+	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+	}
 	if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wait))
 		wake_up(&ctx->wait);
 	if (ctx->sq_data && waitqueue_active(&ctx->sq_data->wait))