提交 b2d9323d 编写于 作者: J john stultz 提交者: Linus Torvalds

Use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS for timer distribution

To avoid lock contention, we distribute the sched_timer calls across the
cpus so they do not trigger at the same instant.  However, I used NR_CPUS,
which can cause needless grouping on small smp systems depending on your
kernel config.  This patch converts to using num_possible_cpus() so we
spread it as evenly as possible on every machine.

Briefly tested w/ NR_CPUS=255 and verified reduced contention.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 3075d9da
......@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ void tick_setup_sched_timer(void)
/* Get the next period (per cpu) */
ts->sched_timer.expires = tick_init_jiffy_update();
offset = ktime_to_ns(tick_period) >> 1;
do_div(offset, NR_CPUS);
do_div(offset, num_possible_cpus());
offset *= smp_processor_id();
ts->sched_timer.expires = ktime_add_ns(ts->sched_timer.expires, offset);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册