perf/core: Fix hardlockup failure caused by perf throttle

stable inclusion
from stable-v4.19.283
commit 6805c1fcbe37989dd6fa4d545d04ccbea5e69d1f
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7BZ5U
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 15def34e ]

commit e050e3f0 ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling")
introduces a change in throttling threshold judgment. Before this,
compare hwc->interrupts and max_samples_per_tick, then increase
hwc->interrupts by 1, but this commit reverses order of these two
behaviors, causing the semantics of max_samples_per_tick to change.
In literal sense of "max_samples_per_tick", if hwc->interrupts ==
max_samples_per_tick, it should not be throttled, therefore, the judgment
condition should be changed to "hwc->interrupts > max_samples_per_tick".

In fact, this may cause the hardlockup to fail, The minimum value of
max_samples_per_tick may be 1, in this case, the return value of
__perf_event_account_interrupt function is 1.
As a result, nmi_watchdog gets throttled, which would stop PMU (Use x86
architecture as an example, see x86_pmu_handle_irq).

Fixes: e050e3f0 ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling")
Signed-off-by: NYang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230227023508.102230-1-yangjihong1@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>

kernel/events/core.c

@@ -7865,8 +7865,8 @@ __perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event, int throttle)
 		hwc->interrupts = 1;
 	} else {
 		hwc->interrupts++;
-		if (unlikely(throttle
-			     && hwc->interrupts >= max_samples_per_tick)) {
+		if (unlikely(throttle &&
+			     hwc->interrupts > max_samples_per_tick)) {
 			__this_cpu_inc(perf_throttled_count);
 			tick_dep_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS);
 			hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;