提交 af71f8fe 编写于 作者: G Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交者: Kalle Valo

iwlegacy: common: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 201384 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
上级 e9904084
......@@ -2695,6 +2695,7 @@ il_set_decrypted_flag(struct il_priv *il, struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
if ((decrypt_res & RX_RES_STATUS_DECRYPT_TYPE_MSK) ==
RX_RES_STATUS_BAD_KEY_TTAK)
break;
/* fall through */
case RX_RES_STATUS_SEC_TYPE_WEP:
if ((decrypt_res & RX_RES_STATUS_DECRYPT_TYPE_MSK) ==
......@@ -2704,6 +2705,7 @@ il_set_decrypted_flag(struct il_priv *il, struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
D_RX("Packet destroyed\n");
return -1;
}
/* fall through */
case RX_RES_STATUS_SEC_TYPE_CCMP:
if ((decrypt_res & RX_RES_STATUS_DECRYPT_TYPE_MSK) ==
RX_RES_STATUS_DECRYPT_OK) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册