bpf: No need to simulate speculative domain for immediates

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.41
commit 27acfd11ba179b746f55077edf9750f8f7cb1cb6
bugzilla: 51890
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

commit a7036191 upstream.

In 801c6058 ("bpf: Fix leakage of uninitialized bpf stack under
speculation") we replaced masking logic with direct loads of immediates
if the register is a known constant. Given in this case we do not apply
any masking, there is also no reason for the operation to be truncated
under the speculative domain.

Therefore, there is also zero reason for the verifier to branch-off and
simulate this case, it only needs to do it for unknown but bounded scalars.
As a side-effect, this also enables few test cases that were previously
rejected due to simulation under zero truncation.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NPiotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

@@ -5802,8 +5802,12 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	/* If we're in commit phase, we're done here given we already
 	 * pushed the truncated dst_reg into the speculative verification
 	 * stack.
+	 *
+	 * Also, when register is a known constant, we rewrite register-based
+	 * operation to immediate-based, and thus do not need masking (and as
+	 * a consequence, do not need to simulate the zero-truncation either).
 	 */
-	if (commit_window)
+	if (commit_window || off_is_imm)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Simulate and find potential out-of-bounds access under