提交 a31196b0 编写于 作者: E Eric Dumazet 提交者: David S. Miller

net: rfs: fix crash in get_rps_cpus()

Commit 567e4b79 ("net: rfs: add hash collision detection") had one
mistake :

RPS_NO_CPU is no longer the marker for invalid cpu in set_rps_cpu()
and get_rps_cpu(), as @next_cpu was the result of an AND with
rps_cpu_mask

This bug showed up on a host with 72 cpus :
next_cpu was 0x7f, and the code was trying to access percpu data of an
non existent cpu.

In a follow up patch, we might get rid of compares against nr_cpu_ids,
if we init the tables with 0. This is silly to test for a very unlikely
condition that exists only shortly after table initialization, as
we got rid of rps_reset_sock_flow() and similar functions that were
writing this RPS_NO_CPU magic value at flow dismantle : When table is
old enough, it never contains this value anymore.

Fixes: 567e4b79 ("net: rfs: add hash collision detection")
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 7cdbc6f7
......@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ following is true:
- The current CPU's queue head counter >= the recorded tail counter
value in rps_dev_flow[i]
- The current CPU is unset (equal to RPS_NO_CPU)
- The current CPU is unset (>= nr_cpu_ids)
- The current CPU is offline
After this check, the packet is sent to the (possibly updated) current
......
......@@ -3079,7 +3079,7 @@ static struct rps_dev_flow *
set_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct rps_dev_flow *rflow, u16 next_cpu)
{
if (next_cpu != RPS_NO_CPU) {
if (next_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
struct rps_dev_flow_table *flow_table;
......@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
* If the desired CPU (where last recvmsg was done) is
* different from current CPU (one in the rx-queue flow
* table entry), switch if one of the following holds:
* - Current CPU is unset (equal to RPS_NO_CPU).
* - Current CPU is unset (>= nr_cpu_ids).
* - Current CPU is offline.
* - The current CPU's queue tail has advanced beyond the
* last packet that was enqueued using this table entry.
......@@ -3192,14 +3192,14 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
* have been dequeued, thus preserving in order delivery.
*/
if (unlikely(tcpu != next_cpu) &&
(tcpu == RPS_NO_CPU || !cpu_online(tcpu) ||
(tcpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(tcpu) ||
((int)(per_cpu(softnet_data, tcpu).input_queue_head -
rflow->last_qtail)) >= 0)) {
tcpu = next_cpu;
rflow = set_rps_cpu(dev, skb, rflow, next_cpu);
}
if (tcpu != RPS_NO_CPU && cpu_online(tcpu)) {
if (tcpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(tcpu)) {
*rflowp = rflow;
cpu = tcpu;
goto done;
......@@ -3240,14 +3240,14 @@ bool rps_may_expire_flow(struct net_device *dev, u16 rxq_index,
struct rps_dev_flow_table *flow_table;
struct rps_dev_flow *rflow;
bool expire = true;
int cpu;
unsigned int cpu;
rcu_read_lock();
flow_table = rcu_dereference(rxqueue->rps_flow_table);
if (flow_table && flow_id <= flow_table->mask) {
rflow = &flow_table->flows[flow_id];
cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(rflow->cpu);
if (rflow->filter == filter_id && cpu != RPS_NO_CPU &&
if (rflow->filter == filter_id && cpu < nr_cpu_ids &&
((int)(per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu).input_queue_head -
rflow->last_qtail) <
(int)(10 * flow_table->mask)))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册