提交 a12bffeb 编写于 作者: F Filippo Muzzini 提交者: Jens Axboe

block, bfq: remove wrong lock in bfq_requests_merged

In bfq_requests_merged(), there is a deadlock because the lock on
bfqq->bfqd->lock is held by the calling function, but the code of
this function tries to grab the lock again.

This deadlock is currently hidden by another bug (fixed by next commit
for this source file), which causes the body of bfq_requests_merged()
to be never executed.

This commit removes the deadlock by removing the lock/unlock pair.
Signed-off-by: NFilippo Muzzini <filippo.muzzini@outlook.it>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
上级 04c4950d
......@@ -1847,7 +1847,6 @@ static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&rq->rb_node))
goto end;
spin_lock_irq(&bfqq->bfqd->lock);
/*
* If next and rq belong to the same bfq_queue and next is older
......@@ -1872,7 +1871,6 @@ static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
bfq_remove_request(q, next);
bfqg_stats_update_io_remove(bfqq_group(bfqq), next->cmd_flags);
spin_unlock_irq(&bfqq->bfqd->lock);
end:
bfqg_stats_update_io_merged(bfqq_group(bfqq), next->cmd_flags);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册