提交 a0592d42 编写于 作者: B Benjamin Herrenschmidt

powerpc: kill the obsolete code under is_global_init()

The code under "if (is_global_init())" is bogus, and is_global_init()
itself is not right in mt case.

Contrary to what the comment says, nowadays force_sig_info() does kill
init even if the handler is SIG_DFL. Note that force_sig_info() clears
SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE exactly for this case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
上级 3aa565f5
......@@ -198,28 +198,6 @@ void _exception(int signr, struct pt_regs *regs, int code, unsigned long addr)
info.si_code = code;
info.si_addr = (void __user *) addr;
force_sig_info(signr, &info, current);
/*
* Init gets no signals that it doesn't have a handler for.
* That's all very well, but if it has caused a synchronous
* exception and we ignore the resulting signal, it will just
* generate the same exception over and over again and we get
* nowhere. Better to kill it and let the kernel panic.
*/
if (is_global_init(current)) {
__sighandler_t handler;
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
handler = current->sighand->action[signr-1].sa.sa_handler;
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
if (handler == SIG_DFL) {
/* init has generated a synchronous exception
and it doesn't have a handler for the signal */
printk(KERN_CRIT "init has generated signal %d "
"but has no handler for it\n", signr);
do_exit(signr);
}
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册