cifs: delete duplicated words in header files

Drop repeated words in multiple comments.
(be, use, the, See)
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>

fs/cifs/cifsacl.h

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct cifs_ace {
 /*
  * The current SMB3 form of security descriptor is similar to what was used for
  * cifs (see above) but some fields are split, and fields in the struct below
- * matches names of fields to the the spec, MS-DTYP (see sections 2.4.5 and
+ * matches names of fields to the spec, MS-DTYP (see sections 2.4.5 and
  * 2.4.6). Note that "CamelCase" fields are used in this struct in order to
  * match the MS-DTYP and MS-SMB2 specs which define the wire format.
  */
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct smb3_acl {
 
 /*
  * Used to store the special 'NFS SIDs' used to persist the POSIX uid and gid
- * See See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh509017(v=ws.10).aspx
+ * See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh509017(v=ws.10).aspx
  */
 struct owner_sid {
 	u8 Revision;

fs/cifs/cifsglob.h

@@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ struct cifsInodeInfo {
 	struct list_head llist;	/* locks helb by this inode */
 	/*
 	 * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
-	 * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
+	 * we must always use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
 	 * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
 	 */
 	struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;	/* protect the fields above */

fs/cifs/smb2pdu.h

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  * Note that, due to trying to use names similar to the protocol specifications,
  * there are many mixed case field names in the structures below.  Although
  * this does not match typical Linux kernel style, it is necessary to be
- * be able to match against the protocol specfication.
+ * able to match against the protocol specfication.
  *
  * SMB2 commands
  * Some commands have minimal (wct=0,bcc=0), or uninteresting, responses