提交 a00664c9 编写于 作者: Í Íñigo Huguet 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

sfc: ensure correct number of XDP queues

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.54
commit 624290f368af1be41f16b2474f9dd406706f88f5
bugzilla: 175586 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DVDU

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=624290f368af1be41f16b2474f9dd406706f88f5

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 788bc000 ]

Commit 99ba0ea6 ("sfc: adjust efx->xdp_tx_queue_count with the real
number of initialized queues") intended to fix a problem caused by a
round up when calculating the number of XDP channels and queues.
However, this was not the real problem. The real problem was that the
number of XDP TX queues had been reduced to half in
commit e26ca4b5 ("sfc: reduce the number of requested xdp ev queues"),
but the variable xdp_tx_queue_count had remained the same.

Once the correct number of XDP TX queues is created again in the
previous patch of this series, this also can be reverted since the error
doesn't actually exist.

Only in the case that there is a bug in the code we can have different
values in xdp_queue_number and efx->xdp_tx_queue_count. Because of this,
and per Edward Cree's suggestion, I add instead a WARN_ON to catch if it
happens again in the future.

Note that the number of allocated queues can be higher than the number
of used ones due to the round up, as explained in the existing comment
in the code. That's why we also have to stop increasing xdp_queue_number
beyond efx->xdp_tx_queue_count.
Signed-off-by: NÍñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 864247d5
......@@ -889,18 +889,20 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
if (efx_channel_is_xdp_tx(channel)) {
efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue(tx_queue, channel) {
tx_queue->queue = next_queue++;
netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Channel %u TXQ %u is XDP %u, HW %u\n",
channel->channel, tx_queue->label,
xdp_queue_number, tx_queue->queue);
/* We may have a few left-over XDP TX
* queues owing to xdp_tx_queue_count
* not dividing evenly by EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL.
* We still allocate and probe those
* TXQs, but never use them.
*/
if (xdp_queue_number < efx->xdp_tx_queue_count)
if (xdp_queue_number < efx->xdp_tx_queue_count) {
netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Channel %u TXQ %u is XDP %u, HW %u\n",
channel->channel, tx_queue->label,
xdp_queue_number, tx_queue->queue);
efx->xdp_tx_queues[xdp_queue_number] = tx_queue;
xdp_queue_number++;
xdp_queue_number++;
}
}
} else {
efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue(tx_queue, channel) {
......@@ -912,6 +914,7 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
}
}
}
WARN_ON(xdp_queue_number != efx->xdp_tx_queue_count);
rc = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(efx->net_dev, efx->n_tx_channels);
if (rc)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册