提交 9f13ef67 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo 提交者: Jens Axboe

blkcg: use double locking instead of RCU for blkg synchronization

blkgs are chained from both blkcgs and request_queues and thus
subjected to two locks - blkcg->lock and q->queue_lock.  As both blkcg
and q can go away anytime, locking during removal is tricky.  It's
currently solved by wrapping removal inside RCU, which makes the
synchronization complex.  There are three locks to worry about - the
outer RCU, q lock and blkcg lock, and it leads to nasty subtle
complications like conditional synchronize_rcu() on queue exit paths.

For all other paths, blkcg lock is naturally nested inside q lock and
the only exception is blkcg removal path, which is a very cold path
and can be implemented as clumsy but conceptually-simple reverse
double lock dancing.

This patch updates blkg removal path such that blkgs are removed while
holding both q and blkcg locks, which is trivial for request queue
exit path - blkg_destroy_all().  The blkcg removal path,
blkiocg_pre_destroy(), implements reverse double lock dancing
essentially identical to ioc_release_fn().

This simplifies blkg locking - no half-dead blkgs to worry about.  Now
unnecessary RCU annotations will be removed by the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
上级 e8989fae
......@@ -620,32 +620,6 @@ struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup_create);
static void __blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
hlist_del_init_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node);
}
/*
* returns 0 if blkio_group was still on cgroup list. Otherwise returns 1
* indicating that blk_group was unhashed by the time we got to it.
*/
int blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 1;
spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
if (!hlist_unhashed(&blkg->blkcg_node)) {
__blkiocg_del_blkio_group(blkg);
ret = 0;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkiocg_del_blkio_group);
/* called under rcu_read_lock(). */
struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q)
......@@ -663,12 +637,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
static void blkg_destroy(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
lockdep_assert_held(&blkcg->lock);
/* Something wrong if we are trying to remove same group twice */
WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&blkg->q_node));
WARN_ON_ONCE(hlist_unhashed(&blkg->blkcg_node));
list_del_init(&blkg->q_node);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node);
WARN_ON_ONCE(q->nr_blkgs <= 0);
q->nr_blkgs--;
......@@ -713,45 +691,33 @@ void update_root_blkg_pd(struct request_queue *q, enum blkio_policy_id plid)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(update_root_blkg_pd);
/**
* blkg_destroy_all - destroy all blkgs associated with a request_queue
* @q: request_queue of interest
* @destroy_root: whether to destroy root blkg or not
*
* Destroy blkgs associated with @q. If @destroy_root is %true, all are
* destroyed; otherwise, root blkg is left alone.
*/
void blkg_destroy_all(struct request_queue *q, bool destroy_root)
{
struct blkio_group *blkg, *n;
while (true) {
bool done = true;
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(blkg, n, &q->blkg_list, q_node) {
/* skip root? */
if (!destroy_root && blkg->blkcg == &blkio_root_cgroup)
continue;
/*
* If cgroup removal path got to blk_group first
* and removed it from cgroup list, then it will
* take care of destroying cfqg also.
*/
if (!blkiocg_del_blkio_group(blkg))
blkg_destroy(blkg);
else
done = false;
}
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(blkg, n, &q->blkg_list, q_node) {
struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
/*
* Group list may not be empty if we raced cgroup removal
* and lost. cgroup removal is guaranteed to make forward
* progress and retrying after a while is enough. This
* ugliness is scheduled to be removed after locking
* update.
*/
if (done)
break;
/* skip root? */
if (!destroy_root && blkg->blkcg == &blkio_root_cgroup)
continue;
msleep(10); /* just some random duration I like */
spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
blkg_destroy(blkg);
spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_destroy_all);
......@@ -1600,45 +1566,45 @@ static int blkiocg_populate(struct cgroup_subsys *subsys, struct cgroup *cgroup)
ARRAY_SIZE(blkio_files));
}
/**
* blkiocg_pre_destroy - cgroup pre_destroy callback
* @subsys: cgroup subsys
* @cgroup: cgroup of interest
*
* This function is called when @cgroup is about to go away and responsible
* for shooting down all blkgs associated with @cgroup. blkgs should be
* removed while holding both q and blkcg locks. As blkcg lock is nested
* inside q lock, this function performs reverse double lock dancing.
*
* This is the blkcg counterpart of ioc_release_fn().
*/
static int blkiocg_pre_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *subsys,
struct cgroup *cgroup)
{
struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(cgroup);
unsigned long flags;
struct blkio_group *blkg;
struct request_queue *q;
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
do {
spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
while (!hlist_empty(&blkcg->blkg_list)) {
struct blkio_group *blkg = hlist_entry(blkcg->blkg_list.first,
struct blkio_group, blkcg_node);
struct request_queue *q = rcu_dereference(blkg->q);
if (hlist_empty(&blkcg->blkg_list)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
break;
if (spin_trylock(q->queue_lock)) {
blkg_destroy(blkg);
spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
} else {
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
cpu_relax();
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
}
}
blkg = hlist_entry(blkcg->blkg_list.first, struct blkio_group,
blkcg_node);
q = rcu_dereference(blkg->q);
__blkiocg_del_blkio_group(blkg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
/*
* This blkio_group is being unlinked as associated cgroup is
* going away. Let all the IO controlling policies know about
* this event.
*/
spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
blkg_destroy(blkg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
} while (1);
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ static inline void blkiocg_set_start_empty_time(struct blkio_group *blkg,
extern struct blkio_cgroup blkio_root_cgroup;
extern struct blkio_cgroup *cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup);
extern struct blkio_cgroup *task_blkio_cgroup(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern int blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg);
extern struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q);
struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
......@@ -416,9 +415,6 @@ cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup) { return NULL; }
static inline struct blkio_cgroup *
task_blkio_cgroup(struct task_struct *tsk) { return NULL; }
static inline int
blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg) { return 0; }
static inline struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
void *key) { return NULL; }
static inline void blkiocg_update_timeslice_used(struct blkio_group *blkg,
......
......@@ -79,11 +79,6 @@ static inline void cfq_blkiocg_update_completion_stats(struct blkio_group *blkg,
direction, sync);
}
static inline int cfq_blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
return blkiocg_del_blkio_group(blkg);
}
#else /* CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */
static inline void cfq_blkiocg_update_io_add_stats(struct blkio_group *blkg,
struct blkio_policy_type *pol,
......@@ -119,10 +114,5 @@ static inline void cfq_blkiocg_update_completion_stats(struct blkio_group *blkg,
struct blkio_policy_type *pol, uint64_t start_time,
uint64_t io_start_time, bool direction, bool sync) { }
static inline int cfq_blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
return 0;
}
#endif /* CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */
#endif
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册