libbpf: Add support for new llvm bpf relocations
LLVM patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D102712 narrowed the scope of existing R_BPF_64_64 and R_BPF_64_32 relocations, and added three new relocations, R_BPF_64_ABS64, R_BPF_64_ABS32 and R_BPF_64_NODYLD32. The main motivation is to make relocations linker friendly. This change, unfortunately, breaks libbpf build, and we will see errors like below: libbpf: ELF relo #0 in section #6 has unexpected type 2 in /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_tcp_nogpl.o Error: failed to link '/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_tcp_nogpl.o': Unknown error -22 (-22) The new relocation R_BPF_64_ABS64 is generated and libbpf linker sanity check doesn't understand it. Relocation section '.rel.struct_ops' at offset 0x1410 contains 1 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name 0000000000000018 0000000700000002 R_BPF_64_ABS64 0000000000000000 nogpltcp_init Look at the selftests/bpf/bpf_tcp_nogpl.c, void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(nogpltcp_init, struct sock *sk) { } SEC(".struct_ops") struct tcp_congestion_ops bpf_nogpltcp = { .init = (void *)nogpltcp_init, .name = "bpf_nogpltcp", }; The new llvm relocation scheme categorizes 'nogpltcp_init' reference as R_BPF_64_ABS64 instead of R_BPF_64_64 which is used to specify ld_imm64 relocation in the new scheme. Let us fix the linker sanity checking by including R_BPF_64_ABS64 and R_BPF_64_ABS32. There is no need to check R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 which is used for .BTF and .BTF.ext. Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210522162341.3687617-1-yhs@fb.com
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录