提交 9cd47424 编写于 作者: D Dave Airlie

drm/mode: reduce scope of fb_lock in framebuffer init

We don't need to hold the fb lock around the initialisation,
only around the list manipulaton.

So do the lock hold only around the register for now.

From Daniel:
Previously fb refcounting, and especially the weak reference
(kref_get_unless_zero) used in fb lookups have been protected by fb_lock.
But with the refactoring to share refcounting in the drm_mode_object base
class that switched to being protected by idr_mutex, which means fb_lock
critical sections can be reduced.
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
上级 cee26ac4
......@@ -458,21 +458,22 @@ int drm_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fb->filp_head);
fb->dev = dev;
fb->funcs = funcs;
ret = drm_mode_object_get_reg(dev, &fb->base, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_FB,
true, drm_framebuffer_free);
false, drm_framebuffer_free);
if (ret)
goto out;
mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
dev->mode_config.num_fb++;
list_add(&fb->head, &dev->mode_config.fb_list);
out:
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
drm_mode_object_register(dev, &fb->base);
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
out:
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_framebuffer_init);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册