Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
提交 9c9464cc 编写于 作者: F Filipe Manana
浏览文件
操作

Btrfs: fix extent accounting for partial direct IO writes 

When doing a write using direct IO we can end up not doing the whole write
operation using the direct IO path, in that case we fallback to a buffered
write to do the remaining IO. This happens for example if the range we are
writing to contains a compressed extent.
When we do a partial write and fallback to buffered IO, due to the
existence of a compressed extent for example, we end up not adjusting the
outstanding extents counter of our inode which ends up getting decremented
twice, once by the DIO ordered extent for the partial write and once again
by btrfs_direct_IO(), resulting in an arithmetic underflow at
extent-tree.c:drop_outstanding_extent(). For example if we have:

  extents        [ prealloc extent ] [ compressed extent ]
  offsets        A        B          C       D           E

and at the moment our inode's outstanding extents counter is 0, if we do a
direct IO write against the range [B, D[ (which has a length smaller than
128Mb), we end up bumping our inode's outstanding extents counter to 1, we
create a DIO ordered extent for the range [B, C[ and then fallback to a
buffered write for the range [C, D[. The direct IO handler
(inode.c:btrfs_direct_IO()) decrements the outstanding extents counter by
1, leaving it with a value of 0, through a call to
btrfs_delalloc_release_space() and then shortly after the DIO ordered
extent finishes and calls btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata() which ends
up to attempt to decrement the inode's outstanding extents counter by 1,
resulting in an assertion failure at drop_outstanding_extent() because
the operation would result in an arithmetic underflow (0 - 1). This
produces the following trace:

  [125471.336838] BTRFS: assertion failed: BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents >= num_extents, file: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, line: 5526
  [125471.338844] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [125471.340745] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4173!
  [125471.340745] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
  [125471.340745] Modules linked in: btrfs f2fs xfs libcrc32c dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc acpi_cpufreq psmouse i2c_piix4 parport pcspkr serio_raw microcode processor evdev i2c_core button ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci virtio_ring floppy libata virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
  [125471.340745] CPU: 10 PID: 23649 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Tainted: G        W       4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
  [125471.340745] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
  [125471.340745] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
  [125471.340745] task: ffff8804244fcf80 ti: ffff88040a118000 task.ti: ffff88040a118000
  [125471.340745] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0550da1>]  [<ffffffffa0550da1>] assfail.constprop.46+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
  [125471.340745] RSP: 0018:ffff88040a11bc78  EFLAGS: 00010296
  [125471.340745] RAX: 0000000000000075 RBX: 0000000000005000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [125471.340745] RDX: ffffffff81098f93 RSI: ffffffff8147c619 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [125471.340745] RBP: ffff88040a11bc78 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
  [125471.340745] R10: ffff88040a11bc08 R11: ffffffff81651000 R12: ffff8803efb4a000
  [125471.340745] R13: ffff8803efb4a000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8802f8e33c88
  [125471.340745] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88043dd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [125471.340745] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
  [125471.340745] CR2: 00007fae7ca86095 CR3: 0000000001a0b000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
  [125471.340745] Stack:
  [125471.340745]  ffff88040a11bc88 ffffffffa04ca0cd ffff88040a11bcc8 ffffffffa04ceeb1
  [125471.340745]  ffff8802f8e33940 ffff8802c93eadb0 ffff8802f8e0bf50 ffff8803efb4a000
  [125471.340745]  0000000000000000 ffff8802f8e33c88 ffff88040a11bd38 ffffffffa04eccfa
  [125471.340745] Call Trace:
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa04ca0cd>] drop_outstanding_extent+0x3d/0x6d [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa04ceeb1>] btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata+0x51/0xdd [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa04eccfa>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x420/0x4eb [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa04ecdda>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa050e6e8>] normal_work_helper+0x14c/0x32a [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffffa050e9c8>] btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x14 [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff81063b23>] process_one_work+0x24a/0x4ac
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff81064285>] worker_thread+0x206/0x2c2
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff8106407f>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2cb/0x2cb
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff8106407f>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2cb/0x2cb
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff8106904d>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff81068f5e>] ? kthread_parkme+0x24/0x24
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff8147d10f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
  [125471.340745]  [<ffffffff81068f5e>] ? kthread_parkme+0x24/0x24
  [125471.340745] Code: a5 55 a0 48 89 e5 e8 42 50 bc e0 0f 0b 55 89 f1 48 c7 c2 f0 a8 55 a0 48 89 fe 31 c0 48 c7 c7 14 aa 55 a0 48 89 e5 e8 22 50 bc e0 <0f> 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 31 c9 ba 18 00 00 00 48 89 e5 41 56 41
  [125471.340745] RIP  [<ffffffffa0550da1>] assfail.constprop.46+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
  [125471.340745]  RSP <ffff88040a11bc78>
  [125471.539620] ---[ end trace 144259f7838b4aa4 ]---

So fix this by ensuring we adjust the outstanding extents counter when we
do the fallback just like we do for the case where the whole write can be
done through the direct IO path.

We were also adjusting the outstanding extents counter by a constant value
of 1, which is incorrect because we were ignorning that we account extents
in BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE units, o fix that as well.

The following test case for fstests reproduces this issue:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"
  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _need_to_be_root
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _require_xfs_io_command "falloc"

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount "-o compress"

  # Create a compressed extent covering the range [700K, 800K[.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 100K 700K 100K" \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Create prealloc extent covering the range [600K, 700K[.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 600K 100K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # Write 80K of data to the range [640K, 720K[ using direct IO. This
  # range covers both the prealloc extent and the compressed extent.
  # Because there's a compressed extent in the range we are writing to,
  # the DIO write code path ends up only writing the first 60k of data,
  # which goes to the prealloc extent, and then falls back to buffered IO
  # for writing the remaining 20K of data - because that remaining data
  # maps to a file range containing a compressed extent.
  # When falling back to buffered IO, we used to trigger an assertion when
  # releasing reserved space due to bad accounting of the inode's
  # outstanding extents counter, which was set to 1 but we ended up
  # decrementing it by 1 twice, once through the ordered extent for the
  # 60K of data we wrote using direct IO, and once through the main direct
  # IO handler (inode.cbtrfs_direct_IO()) because the direct IO write
  # wrote less than 80K of data (60K).
  $XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 80K 640K 80K" \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now similar test as above but for very large write operations. This
  # triggers special cases for an inode's outstanding extents accounting,
  # as internally btrfs logically splits extents into 128Mb units.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -s \
      -c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 128M 258M 128M" \
      -c "falloc 0 258M" \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_xfs_io
  $XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 256M 3M 256M" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar \
      | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now verify the file contents are correct and that they are the same
  # even after unmounting and mounting the fs again (or evicting the page
  # cache).
  #
  # For file foo, all bytes in the range [0, 640K[ must have a value of
  # 0x00, all bytes in the range [640K, 720K[ must have a value of 0xbb
  # and all bytes in the range [720K, 800K[ must have a value of 0xaa.
  #
  # For file bar, all bytes in the range [0, 3M[ must havea value of 0x00,
  # all bytes in the range [3M, 259M[ must have a value of 0xbb and all
  # bytes in the range [259M, 386M[ must have a value of 0xaa.
  #
  echo "File digests before remounting the file system:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch
  _scratch_remount
  echo "File digests after remounting the file system:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch

  status=0
  exit

Fixes: e1cbbfa5 ("Btrfs: fix outstanding_extents accounting in DIO")
Fixes: 3e05bde8 ("Btrfs: only adjust outstanding_extents when we do a short write")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
上级 2959a32a
隐藏空白更改
内联 并排
Showing with 37 addition and 15 deletion
fs/btrfs/inode.c
浏览文件 @ 9c9464cc
......@@ -7506,6 +7506,28 @@ struct btrfs_dio_data {
u64 reserve;
};
static void adjust_dio_outstanding_extents(struct inode *inode,
struct btrfs_dio_data *dio_data,
const u64 len)
{
unsigned num_extents;
num_extents = (unsigned) div64_u64(len + BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE - 1,
BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE);
/*
* If we have an outstanding_extents count still set then we're
* within our reservation, otherwise we need to adjust our inode
* counter appropriately.
*/
if (dio_data->outstanding_extents) {
dio_data->outstanding_extents -= num_extents;
} else {
spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents += num_extents;
spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
}
}
static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
{
......@@ -7541,8 +7563,11 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
* If this errors out it's because we couldn't invalidate pagecache for
* this range and we need to fallback to buffered.
*/
if (lock_extent_direct(inode, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state, create))
return -ENOTBLK;
if (lock_extent_direct(inode, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state,
create)) {
ret = -ENOTBLK;
goto err;
}
em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, start, len, 0);
if (IS_ERR(em)) {
......@@ -7660,19 +7685,7 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
if (start + len > i_size_read(inode))
i_size_write(inode, start + len);
/*
* If we have an outstanding_extents count still set then we're
* within our reservation, otherwise we need to adjust our inode
* counter appropriately.
*/
if (dio_data->outstanding_extents) {
(dio_data->outstanding_extents)--;
} else {
spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++;
spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
}
adjust_dio_outstanding_extents(inode, dio_data, len);
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, start, len);
WARN_ON(dio_data->reserve < len);
dio_data->reserve -= len;
......@@ -7699,8 +7712,17 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
unlock_err:
clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart, lockend,
unlock_bits, 1, 0, &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
err:
if (dio_data)
current->journal_info = dio_data;
/*
* Compensate the delalloc release we do in btrfs_direct_IO() when we
* write less data then expected, so that we don't underflow our inode's
* outstanding extents counter.
*/
if (create && dio_data)
adjust_dio_outstanding_extents(inode, dio_data, len);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% 或 .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑！
想要评论请 注册 或