KVM: x86: Remove KF() macro placeholder
Although well-intentioned, keeping the KF() definition as a hint for handling scattered CPUID features may be counter-productive. Simply redefining the bit position only works for directly manipulating the guest's CPUID leafs, e.g. it doesn't make guest_cpuid_has() magically work. Taking an alternative approach, e.g. ensuring the bit position is identical between the Linux-defined and hardware-defined features, may be a simpler and/or more effective method of exposing scattered features to the guest. Signed-off-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRadim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录