lib/list_debug.c: Detect uninitialized lists

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.138
commit 58275db3c7d220121b044d2367c550fba76ec8ef
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I60QFD

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=58275db3c7d220121b044d2367c550fba76ec8ef

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 0cc011c5 ]

In some circumstances, attempts are made to add entries to or to remove
entries from an uninitialized list.  A prime example is
amdgpu_bo_vm_destroy(): It is indirectly called from
ttm_bo_init_reserved() if that function fails, and tries to remove an
entry from a list.  However, that list is only initialized in
amdgpu_bo_create_vm() after the call to ttm_bo_init_reserved() returned
success.  This results in crashes such as

 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
 PGD 0 P4D 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
 CPU: 1 PID: 1479 Comm: chrome Not tainted 5.10.110-15768-g29a72e65dae5
 Hardware name: Google Grunt/Grunt, BIOS Google_Grunt.11031.149.0 07/15/2020
 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x26/0x7d
 ...
 Call Trace:
  amdgpu_bo_vm_destroy+0x48/0x8b
  ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x1d7/0x1e0
  amdgpu_bo_create+0x212/0x476
  ? amdgpu_bo_user_destroy+0x23/0x23
  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x60/0x271
  amdgpu_bo_create_vm+0x40/0x7d
  amdgpu_vm_pt_create+0xe8/0x24b
 ...

Check if the list's prev and next pointers are NULL to catch such problems.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220531222951.92073-1-linux@roeck-us.netSigned-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NWei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>

lib/list_debug.c

@@ -20,7 +20,11 @@
 bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
 		      struct list_head *next)
 {
-	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
+	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL,
+			"list_add corruption. prev is NULL.\n") ||
+	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL,
+			"list_add corruption. next is NULL.\n") ||
+	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
 			"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
 			prev, next->prev, next) ||
 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
@@ -42,7 +46,11 @@ bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
 	prev = entry->prev;
 	next = entry->next;
 
-	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
+	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL,
+			"list_del corruption, %px->next is NULL\n", entry) ||
+	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL,
+			"list_del corruption, %px->prev is NULL\n", entry) ||
+	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
 			"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
 			entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,