提交 9a63236f 编写于 作者: A Andrey Ryabinin 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm/ksm.c: don't WARN if page is still mapped in remove_stable_node()

It's possible to hit the WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapped(page)) in
remove_stable_node() when it races with __mmput() and squeezes in
between ksm_exit() and exit_mmap().

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3295 at mm/ksm.c:888 remove_stable_node+0x10c/0x150

  Call Trace:
   remove_all_stable_nodes+0x12b/0x330
   run_store+0x4ef/0x7b0
   kernfs_fop_write+0x200/0x420
   vfs_write+0x154/0x450
   ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x99/0x510
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Remove the warning as there is nothing scary going on.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191119131850.5675-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Fixes: cbf86cfe ("ksm: remove old stable nodes more thoroughly")
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 7ce700bf
......@@ -885,13 +885,13 @@ static int remove_stable_node(struct stable_node *stable_node)
return 0;
}
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapped(page))) {
/*
* This should not happen: but if it does, just refuse to let
* merge_across_nodes be switched - there is no need to panic.
*/
err = -EBUSY;
} else {
/*
* Page could be still mapped if this races with __mmput() running in
* between ksm_exit() and exit_mmap(). Just refuse to let
* merge_across_nodes/max_page_sharing be switched.
*/
err = -EBUSY;
if (!page_mapped(page)) {
/*
* The stable node did not yet appear stale to get_ksm_page(),
* since that allows for an unmapped ksm page to be recognized
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册