net: sched: add barrier to ensure correct ordering for lockless qdisc

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.50
commit e7c3ae47978f97f528d95b0c86de51896e78d9f0
bugzilla: 174522 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DNFY

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=e7c3ae47978f97f528d95b0c86de51896e78d9f0

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 89837eb4 ]

The spin_trylock() was assumed to contain the implicit
barrier needed to ensure the correct ordering between
STATE_MISSED setting/clearing and STATE_MISSED checking
in commit a90c57f2 ("net: sched: fix packet stuck
problem for lockless qdisc").

But it turns out that spin_trylock() only has load-acquire
semantic, for strongly-ordered system(like x86), the compiler
barrier implicitly contained in spin_trylock() seems enough
to ensure the correct ordering. But for weakly-orderly system
(like arm64), the store-release semantic is needed to ensure
the correct ordering as clear_bit() and test_bit() is store
operation, see queued_spin_lock().

So add the explicit barrier to ensure the correct ordering
for the above case.

Fixes: a90c57f2 ("net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc")
Signed-off-by: NYunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

include/net/sch_generic.h

@@ -163,6 +163,12 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 		if (spin_trylock(&qdisc->seqlock))
 			goto nolock_empty;
 
+		/* Paired with smp_mb__after_atomic() to make sure
+		 * STATE_MISSED checking is synchronized with clearing
+		 * in pfifo_fast_dequeue().
+		 */
+		smp_mb__before_atomic();
+
 		/* If the MISSED flag is set, it means other thread has
 		 * set the MISSED flag before second spin_trylock(), so
 		 * we can return false here to avoid multi cpus doing
@@ -180,6 +186,12 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 		 */
 		set_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED, &qdisc->state);
 
+		/* spin_trylock() only has load-acquire semantic, so use
+		 * smp_mb__after_atomic() to ensure STATE_MISSED is set
+		 * before doing the second spin_trylock().
+		 */
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();
+
 		/* Retry again in case other CPU may not see the new flag
 		 * after it releases the lock at the end of qdisc_run_end().
 		 */