提交 9843b76a 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig 提交者: Al Viro

fs: skip I_FREEING inodes in writeback_sb_inodes

Skip I_FREEING inodes just like I_WILL_FREE and I_NEW when walking the
writeback lists.  Currenly this can't happen, but once we move from
inode_lock to more fine grained locking we can have an inode that's
still on the writeback lists but has I_FREEING set, and we absolutely
need to skip it here, just like we do for all other inode list walks.

Based on a patch from Dave Chinner.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 a0318786
...@@ -487,10 +487,16 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb, ...@@ -487,10 +487,16 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
return 0; return 0;
} }
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_WILL_FREE)) { /*
* Don't bother with new inodes or inodes beeing freed, first
* kind does not need peridic writeout yet, and for the latter
* kind writeout is handled by the freer.
*/
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
requeue_io(inode); requeue_io(inode);
continue; continue;
} }
/* /*
* Was this inode dirtied after sync_sb_inodes was called? * Was this inode dirtied after sync_sb_inodes was called?
* This keeps sync from extra jobs and livelock. * This keeps sync from extra jobs and livelock.
...@@ -498,7 +504,6 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb, ...@@ -498,7 +504,6 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, wbc->wb_start)) if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, wbc->wb_start))
return 1; return 1;
BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
__iget(inode); __iget(inode);
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped; pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc); writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册