提交 97b9a5a2 编写于 作者: B Ben Nizette 提交者: Linus Torvalds

atmel-lcdc: fix pixclock upper bound detection

AFAICT the code which checks that the requested pixclock value is within
bounds is incorrect.  It ensures that the lcdc core clock is at least
(bytes per pixel) times higher than the pixel clock rather than just
greater than or equal to.

There are tighter restrictions on the pixclock value as a function of bus
width for STN panels but even then it isn't a simple relationship as
currently checked for.  IMO either something like the below patch should
be applied or else more detailed checking logic should be implemented
which takes in to account the panel type as well.
Signed-off-by: NBen Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
Cc: Daniel Glockner <dg@emlix.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 4113819e
......@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int atmel_lcdfb_check_var(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
dev_dbg(dev, " bpp: %u\n", var->bits_per_pixel);
dev_dbg(dev, " clk: %lu KHz\n", clk_value_khz);
if ((PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock) * var->bits_per_pixel / 8) > clk_value_khz) {
if (PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock) > clk_value_khz) {
dev_err(dev, "%lu KHz pixel clock is too fast\n", PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock));
return -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册