提交 94896196 编写于 作者: D Darrick J. Wong

Merge tag 'maxrefcount-fixes-6.2_2022-12-01' of...

Merge tag 'maxrefcount-fixes-6.2_2022-12-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux into xfs-6.2-mergeD

xfs: fix broken MAXREFCOUNT handling

This series fixes a bug in the refcount code where we don't merge
records correctly if the refcount is hovering around MAXREFCOUNT.  This
fixes regressions in xfs/179 when fsdax is enabled.  xfs/179 itself will
be modified to exploit the bug through the pagecache path.
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

* tag 'maxrefcount-fixes-6.2_2022-12-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux:
  xfs: estimate post-merge refcounts correctly
  xfs: hoist refcount record merge predicates
......@@ -815,11 +815,136 @@ xfs_refcount_find_right_extents(
/* Is this extent valid? */
static inline bool
xfs_refc_valid(
struct xfs_refcount_irec *rc)
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *rc)
{
return rc->rc_startblock != NULLAGBLOCK;
}
static inline xfs_nlink_t
xfs_refc_merge_refcount(
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec,
enum xfs_refc_adjust_op adjust)
{
/* Once a record hits MAXREFCOUNT, it is pinned there forever */
if (irec->rc_refcount == MAXREFCOUNT)
return MAXREFCOUNT;
return irec->rc_refcount + adjust;
}
static inline bool
xfs_refc_want_merge_center(
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *left,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *cleft,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *cright,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *right,
bool cleft_is_cright,
enum xfs_refc_adjust_op adjust,
unsigned long long *ulenp)
{
unsigned long long ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
xfs_nlink_t new_refcount;
/*
* To merge with a center record, both shoulder records must be
* adjacent to the record we want to adjust. This is only true if
* find_left and find_right made all four records valid.
*/
if (!xfs_refc_valid(left) || !xfs_refc_valid(right) ||
!xfs_refc_valid(cleft) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
return false;
/* There must only be one record for the entire range. */
if (!cleft_is_cright)
return false;
/* The shoulder record refcounts must match the new refcount. */
new_refcount = xfs_refc_merge_refcount(cleft, adjust);
if (left->rc_refcount != new_refcount)
return false;
if (right->rc_refcount != new_refcount)
return false;
/*
* The new record cannot exceed the max length. ulen is a ULL as the
* individual record block counts can be up to (u32 - 1) in length
* hence we need to catch u32 addition overflows here.
*/
ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount + right->rc_blockcount;
if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
return false;
*ulenp = ulen;
return true;
}
static inline bool
xfs_refc_want_merge_left(
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *left,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *cleft,
enum xfs_refc_adjust_op adjust)
{
unsigned long long ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
xfs_nlink_t new_refcount;
/*
* For a left merge, the left shoulder record must be adjacent to the
* start of the range. If this is true, find_left made left and cleft
* contain valid contents.
*/
if (!xfs_refc_valid(left) || !xfs_refc_valid(cleft))
return false;
/* Left shoulder record refcount must match the new refcount. */
new_refcount = xfs_refc_merge_refcount(cleft, adjust);
if (left->rc_refcount != new_refcount)
return false;
/*
* The new record cannot exceed the max length. ulen is a ULL as the
* individual record block counts can be up to (u32 - 1) in length
* hence we need to catch u32 addition overflows here.
*/
ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount;
if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
return false;
return true;
}
static inline bool
xfs_refc_want_merge_right(
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *cright,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *right,
enum xfs_refc_adjust_op adjust)
{
unsigned long long ulen = right->rc_blockcount;
xfs_nlink_t new_refcount;
/*
* For a right merge, the right shoulder record must be adjacent to the
* end of the range. If this is true, find_right made cright and right
* contain valid contents.
*/
if (!xfs_refc_valid(right) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
return false;
/* Right shoulder record refcount must match the new refcount. */
new_refcount = xfs_refc_merge_refcount(cright, adjust);
if (right->rc_refcount != new_refcount)
return false;
/*
* The new record cannot exceed the max length. ulen is a ULL as the
* individual record block counts can be up to (u32 - 1) in length
* hence we need to catch u32 addition overflows here.
*/
ulen += cright->rc_blockcount;
if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
return false;
return true;
}
/*
* Try to merge with any extents on the boundaries of the adjustment range.
*/
......@@ -861,23 +986,15 @@ xfs_refcount_merge_extents(
(cleft.rc_blockcount == cright.rc_blockcount);
/* Try to merge left, cleft, and right. cleft must == cright. */
ulen = (unsigned long long)left.rc_blockcount + cleft.rc_blockcount +
right.rc_blockcount;
if (xfs_refc_valid(&left) && xfs_refc_valid(&right) &&
xfs_refc_valid(&cleft) && xfs_refc_valid(&cright) && cequal &&
left.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
right.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
if (xfs_refc_want_merge_center(&left, &cleft, &cright, &right, cequal,
adjust, &ulen)) {
*shape_changed = true;
return xfs_refcount_merge_center_extents(cur, &left, &cleft,
&right, ulen, aglen);
}
/* Try to merge left and cleft. */
ulen = (unsigned long long)left.rc_blockcount + cleft.rc_blockcount;
if (xfs_refc_valid(&left) && xfs_refc_valid(&cleft) &&
left.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
if (xfs_refc_want_merge_left(&left, &cleft, adjust)) {
*shape_changed = true;
error = xfs_refcount_merge_left_extent(cur, &left, &cleft,
agbno, aglen);
......@@ -893,10 +1010,7 @@ xfs_refcount_merge_extents(
}
/* Try to merge cright and right. */
ulen = (unsigned long long)right.rc_blockcount + cright.rc_blockcount;
if (xfs_refc_valid(&right) && xfs_refc_valid(&cright) &&
right.rc_refcount == cright.rc_refcount + adjust &&
ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
if (xfs_refc_want_merge_right(&cright, &right, adjust)) {
*shape_changed = true;
return xfs_refcount_merge_right_extent(cur, &right, &cright,
aglen);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册