netfilter: x_tables: Use correct memory barriers.

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.27
commit 3fdebc2d8e7965f946a3d716ffdd482e66c1f46c
bugzilla: 51493

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 175e476b ]

When a new table value was assigned, it was followed by a write memory
barrier. This ensured that all writes before this point would complete
before any writes after this point. However, to determine whether the
rules are unused, the sequence counter is read. To ensure that all
writes have been done before these reads, a full memory barrier is
needed, not just a write memory barrier. The same argument applies when
incrementing the counter, before the rules are read.

Changing to using smp_mb() instead of smp_wmb() fixes the kernel panic
reported in cc00bcaa (which is still present), while still
maintaining the same speed of replacing tables.

The smb_mb() barriers potentially slow the packet path, however testing
has shown no measurable change in performance on a 4-core MIPS64
platform.

Fixes: 7f5c6d4f ("netfilter: get rid of atomic ops in fast path")
Signed-off-by: NMark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: N  Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h

@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xt_write_recseq_begin(void)
 	 * since addend is most likely 1
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_add(xt_recseq.sequence, addend);
-	smp_wmb();
+	smp_mb();
 
 	return addend;
 }

net/netfilter/x_tables.c

@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ xt_replace_table(struct xt_table *table,
 	table->private = newinfo;
 
 	/* make sure all cpus see new ->private value */
-	smp_wmb();
+	smp_mb();
 
 	/*
 	 * Even though table entries have now been swapped, other CPU's