scsi: lpfc: Fix hardlockup in lpfc_abort_handler

In lpfc_abort_handler, the lock acquire order is hbalock (irqsave),
buf_lock (irq) and ring_lock (irq).  The issue is that in two places the
locks are released out of order - the buf_lock and the hbalock - resulting
in the cpu preemption/lock flags getting restored out of order and
deadlocking the cpu.

Fix the unlock order by fully releasing the hbalocks as well.

CC: Zhangguanghui <zhang.guanghui@h3c.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191018211832.7917-7-jsmart2021@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NDick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c

@@ -4848,20 +4848,21 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
 		ret_val = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, LPFC_FCP_RING,
 						abtsiocb, 0);
 	}
-	/* no longer need the lock after this point */
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 
 	if (ret_val == IOCB_ERROR) {
 		/* Indicate the IO is not being aborted by the driver. */
 		iocb->iocb_flag &= ~LPFC_DRIVER_ABORTED;
 		lpfc_cmd->waitq = NULL;
 		spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 		lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, abtsiocb);
 		ret = FAILED;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/* no longer need the lock after this point */
 	spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 
 	if (phba->cfg_poll & DISABLE_FCP_RING_INT)
 		lpfc_sli_handle_fast_ring_event(phba,