mm/slub.c: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock
If we are already under list_lock, don't call kmalloc(). Otherwise we will run into a deadlock because kmalloc() also tries to grab the same lock. Fix the problem by using a static bitmap instead. WARNING: possible recursive locking detected -------------------------------------------- mount-encrypted/4921 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: ___slab_alloc+0x104/0x437 but task is already holding lock: (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x81/0x3cb other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock); lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108193958.205102-2-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by: NYu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录