提交 908329f2 编写于 作者: N NeilBrown 提交者: J. Bruce Fields

sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked.

The extra call to cache_revisit_request in cache_fresh_unlocked is not
needed, as should have been fairly clear at the time of
   commit 4013edea

If there are requests to be revisited, then we can be sure that
CACHE_PENDING is set, so the second call is sufficient.

So remove the first call.
Then remove the 'new' parameter,
then remove the return value for cache_fresh_locked which is only used
to provide the value for 'new'.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
上级 9e4c6379
......@@ -105,18 +105,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
{
head->expiry_time = expiry;
head->last_refresh = get_seconds();
return !test_and_set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
}
static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
struct cache_detail *detail, int new)
struct cache_detail *detail)
{
if (new)
cache_revisit_request(head);
if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
cache_revisit_request(head);
cache_dequeue(detail, head);
......@@ -132,7 +130,6 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
*/
struct cache_head **head;
struct cache_head *tmp;
int is_new;
if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &old->flags)) {
write_lock(&detail->hash_lock);
......@@ -141,9 +138,9 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &old->flags);
else
detail->update(old, new);
is_new = cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, is_new);
cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
return old;
}
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
......@@ -167,11 +164,11 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
*head = tmp;
detail->entries++;
cache_get(tmp);
is_new = cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
cache_fresh_locked(old, 0);
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail, is_new);
cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, 0);
cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail);
cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
cache_put(old, detail);
return tmp;
}
......@@ -240,8 +237,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
cache_revisit_request(h);
if (rv == -EAGAIN) {
set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags);
cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail,
cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY));
cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY);
cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail);
rv = -ENOENT;
}
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册