提交 8d488bbe 编写于 作者: C Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Remove WA_(SET|CLR)_BIT

These macros are of dubious merit when coupled with the per-context w/a
set. Instead of tweaking the value in the context, they tweak the value
based on the mmio at the time of recording; they are almost by
definition not per-context! Having removed the last users, remove the
macros to avoid temptation in the future.

v2: Kill WA_WRITE as well (now also unused).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171004124153.14142-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
上级 53221e11
......@@ -830,11 +830,6 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
WA_REG(addr, mask, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value))
#define WA_SET_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, mask, I915_READ(addr) | (mask))
#define WA_CLR_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, mask, I915_READ(addr) & ~(mask))
#define WA_WRITE(addr, val) WA_REG(addr, 0xffffffff, val)
static int wa_ring_whitelist_reg(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
i915_reg_t reg)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册