提交 8b964eae 编写于 作者: J John Johansen

AppArmor: Fix underflow in xindex calculation

If the xindex value stored in the accept tables is 0, the extraction of
that value will result in an underflow (0 - 4).

In properly compiled policy this should not happen for file rules but
it may be possible for other rule types in the future.

To exploit this underflow a user would have to be able to load a corrupt
policy, which requires CAP_MAC_ADMIN, overwrite system policy in kernel
memory or know of a compiler error resulting in the flaw being present
for loaded policy (no such flaw is known at this time).
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NKees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>
上级 ade3ddc0
......@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline u16 dfa_map_xindex(u16 mask)
index |= AA_X_NAME;
} else if (old_index == 3) {
index |= AA_X_NAME | AA_X_CHILD;
} else {
} else if (old_index) {
index |= AA_X_TABLE;
index |= old_index - 4;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册