提交 89e60548 编写于 作者: N Nick Piggin

fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking

prune_one_dentry can avoid quite a bit of locking in the common case where
ancestors have an elevated refcount. Alternatively, we could have gone the
other way and made fewer trylocks in the case where d_count goes to zero, but
is probably less common.
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
上级 a734eb45
......@@ -582,26 +582,29 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
* Prune ancestors.
*/
while (dentry) {
spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
again:
relock:
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (dentry->d_count > 1) {
dentry->d_count--;
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
return;
}
if (!spin_trylock(&dcache_inode_lock)) {
relock2:
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
cpu_relax();
goto relock;
}
if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
parent = NULL;
else
parent = dentry->d_parent;
if (parent && !spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
goto again;
}
dentry->d_count--;
if (dentry->d_count) {
if (parent)
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
return;
goto relock2;
}
dentry->d_count--;
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
__d_drop(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry, parent);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册