提交 876a7ae6 编写于 作者: A Alexei Starovoitov 提交者: David S. Miller

bpf: fix 64-bit divide

ALU64_DIV instruction should be dividing 64-bit by 64-bit,
whereas do_div() does 64-bit by 32-bit divide.
x64 and arm64 JITs correctly implement 64 by 64 unsigned divide.
llvm BPF backend emits code assuming that ALU64_DIV does 64 by 64.

Fixes: 89aa0758 ("net: sock: allow eBPF programs to be attached to sockets")
Reported-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 8e046d68
......@@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
ALU64_MOD_X:
if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
return 0;
tmp = DST;
DST = do_div(tmp, SRC);
div64_u64_rem(DST, SRC, &tmp);
DST = tmp;
CONT;
ALU_MOD_X:
if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
......@@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
CONT;
ALU64_MOD_K:
tmp = DST;
DST = do_div(tmp, IMM);
div64_u64_rem(DST, IMM, &tmp);
DST = tmp;
CONT;
ALU_MOD_K:
tmp = (u32) DST;
......@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
ALU64_DIV_X:
if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
return 0;
do_div(DST, SRC);
DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
CONT;
ALU_DIV_X:
if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
......@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
DST = (u32) tmp;
CONT;
ALU64_DIV_K:
do_div(DST, IMM);
DST = div64_u64(DST, IMM);
CONT;
ALU_DIV_K:
tmp = (u32) DST;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册