提交 820bc81f 编写于 作者: N Namhyung Kim 提交者: Jiri Olsa

perf tools: Account entry stats when it's added to the output tree

Currently, accounting each sample is done in multiple places - once
when adding them to the input tree, other when adding them to the
output tree.  It's not only confusing but also can cause a subtle
problem since concurrent processing like in perf top might see the
updated stats before adding entries into the output tree - like seeing
more (blank) lines at the end and/or slight inaccurate percentage.

To fix this, only account the entries when it's moved into the output
tree so that they cannot be seen prematurely.  There're some
exceptional cases here and there - they should be addressed separately
with comments.
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398327843-31845-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
上级 87e90f43
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct perf_annotate {
};
static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
struct addr_location *al,
struct perf_annotate *ann)
{
......@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
return -ENOMEM;
ret = hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr);
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -341,11 +341,16 @@ static int diff__process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
return -1;
}
if (al.filtered == 0) {
evsel->hists.stats.total_non_filtered_period += sample->period;
evsel->hists.nr_non_filtered_entries++;
}
/*
* The total_period is updated here before going to the output
* tree since normally only the baseline hists will call
* hists__output_resort() and precompute needs the total
* period in order to sort entries by percentage delta.
*/
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
if (!al.filtered)
evsel->hists.stats.total_non_filtered_period += sample->period;
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static void report__inc_stats(struct report *rep, struct hist_entry *he)
*/
if (he->stat.nr_events == 1)
rep->nr_entries++;
/*
* Only counts number of samples at this stage as it's more
* natural to do it here and non-sample events are also
* counted in perf_session_deliver_event(). The dump_trace
* requires this info is ready before going to the output tree.
*/
hists__inc_nr_events(he->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
if (!he->filtered)
he->hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
}
static int report__add_mem_hist_entry(struct report *rep, struct addr_location *al,
......@@ -135,10 +145,6 @@ static int report__add_mem_hist_entry(struct report *rep, struct addr_location *
report__inc_stats(rep, he);
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += cost;
hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
if (!he->filtered)
evsel->hists.stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
err = hist_entry__append_callchain(he, sample);
out:
return err;
......@@ -189,13 +195,7 @@ static int report__add_branch_hist_entry(struct report *rep, struct addr_locatio
if (err)
goto out;
}
report__inc_stats(rep, he);
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += 1;
hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
if (!he->filtered)
evsel->hists.stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
} else
goto out;
}
......@@ -230,10 +230,6 @@ static int report__add_hist_entry(struct report *rep, struct perf_evsel *evsel,
report__inc_stats(rep, he);
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
if (!he->filtered)
evsel->hists.stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
out:
return err;
}
......
......@@ -382,7 +382,6 @@ static struct hist_entry *add_hist_entry(struct hists *hists,
if (!he)
return NULL;
hists->nr_entries++;
rb_link_node(&he->rb_node_in, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&he->rb_node_in, hists->entries_in);
out:
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册