提交 8207c85b 编写于 作者: W Wang Yufen 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

bpf, sockmap: Fix double uncharge the mem of sk_msg

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.110
commit cd84ea3920aef936c559b63099ef0013ce6b2325
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I545NW

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cd84ea3920aef936c559b63099ef0013ce6b2325

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 2486ab43 ]

If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation, psock may be
freed.

tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
 tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
  sk_msg_return()
  tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir()
   unlikely(!psock))
     sk_msg_free()

The mem of msg has been uncharged in tcp_bpf_send_verdict() by
sk_msg_return(), and would be uncharged by sk_msg_free() again. When psock
is null, we can simply returning an error code, this would then trigger
the sk_msg_free_nocharge in the error path of __SK_REDIRECT and would have
the side effect of throwing an error up to user space. This would be a
slight change in behavior from user side but would look the same as an
error if the redirect on the socket threw an error.

This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
 sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
 process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
 worker_thread+0x30/0x350
 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
 kthread+0xe6/0x110
 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>

Fixes: 604326b4 ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: NWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-5-wangyufen@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 8c76e970
......@@ -212,10 +212,9 @@ int tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg,
struct sk_psock *psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
int ret;
if (unlikely(!psock)) {
sk_msg_free(sk, msg);
return 0;
}
if (unlikely(!psock))
return -EPIPE;
ret = ingress ? bpf_tcp_ingress(sk, psock, msg, bytes, flags) :
tcp_bpf_push_locked(sk, msg, bytes, flags, false);
sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册