提交 80924e5f 编写于 作者: V Vitaliy Gusev 提交者: David S. Miller

tun: use tun_sk instead container_of

Using macro tun_sk is more clear and shorter. However tun.c has tun_sk,
but doesn't use it.
Signed-off-by: NVitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 08fafd84
......@@ -849,13 +849,13 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))
wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep);
tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun;
tun = tun_sk(sk)->tun;
kill_fasync(&tun->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
}
static void tun_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
free_netdev(container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun->dev);
free_netdev(tun_sk(sk)->tun->dev);
}
static struct proto tun_proto = {
......@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
sk->sk_write_space = tun_sock_write_space;
sk->sk_sndbuf = INT_MAX;
container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun = tun;
tun_sk(sk)->tun = tun;
security_tun_dev_post_create(sk);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册