提交 7e17916b 编写于 作者: A Arnd Bergmann 提交者: David Sterba

btrfs: avoid link error with CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE

Note: this patch fixes a problem in a feature outside of btrfs ("kernel
hacking: add a config option to disable compiler auto-inlining") and is
applied ahead of time due to cross-subsystem dependencies.

On 32-bit ARM with gcc-8, I see a link error with the addition of the
CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE option:

fs/btrfs/super.o: In function `btrfs_statfs':
super.c:(.text+0x67b8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x67fc): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x6858): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x6920): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x693c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
fs/btrfs/super.o:super.c:(.text+0x6958): more undefined references to `__aeabi_uldivmod' follow

So far this is the only file that shows the behavior, so I'd propose
to just work around it by marking the functions as 'static inline'
that normally get inlined here.

The reference to __aeabi_uldivmod comes from a div_u64() which has an
optimization for a constant division that uses a straight '/' operator
when the result should be known to the compiler. My interpretation is
that as we turn off inlining, gcc still expects the result to be constant
but fails to use that constant value.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181103153941.1881966-1-arnd@arndb.deReviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
[ add the note ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
上级 761333f2
...@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) ...@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
} }
/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ /* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */
static int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes(const void *dev_info1, static inline int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes(const void *dev_info1,
const void *dev_info2) const void *dev_info2)
{ {
if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail > if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail >
...@@ -1945,8 +1945,8 @@ static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices( ...@@ -1945,8 +1945,8 @@ static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices(
* The helper to calc the free space on the devices that can be used to store * The helper to calc the free space on the devices that can be used to store
* file data. * file data.
*/ */
static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, static inline int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 *free_bytes) u64 *free_bytes)
{ {
struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info; struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info;
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices; struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册