提交 7d985ed1 编写于 作者: A Al Viro 提交者: David S. Miller

rxrpc: bogus MSG_PEEK test in rxrpc_recvmsg()

[I would really like an ACK on that one from dhowells; it appears to be
quite straightforward, but...]

MSG_PEEK isn't passed to ->recvmsg() via msg->msg_flags; as the matter of
fact, neither the kernel users of rxrpc, nor the syscalls ever set that bit
in there.  It gets passed via flags; in fact, another such check in the same
function is done correctly - as flags & MSG_PEEK.

It had been that way (effectively disabled) for 8 years, though, so the patch
needs beating up - that case had never been tested.  If it is correct, it's
-stable fodder.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 3eeff778
......@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
if (!skb) {
/* nothing remains on the queue */
if (copied &&
(msg->msg_flags & MSG_PEEK || timeo == 0))
(flags & MSG_PEEK || timeo == 0))
goto out;
/* wait for a message to turn up */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册