提交 7ce6095e 编写于 作者: L Leon Romanovsky 提交者: Jason Gunthorpe

RDMA/mlx5: Don't add slave port to unaffiliated list

The mlx5_ib_bind_slave_port() doesn't remove multiport device from the
unaffiliated list, but mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port() did it. This unbalanced
flow caused to the situation where mlx5_ib_unaffiliated_port_list was
changed during iteration.

Fixes: 32f69e4b ("{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2726e6603b1e6ecfe76aa5a12a063af72173bcf7.1622477058.git.leonro@nvidia.comReported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
上级 2db7b2ea
......@@ -3182,8 +3182,6 @@ static void mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port(struct mlx5_ib_dev *ibdev,
port->mp.mpi = NULL;
list_add_tail(&mpi->list, &mlx5_ib_unaffiliated_port_list);
spin_unlock(&port->mp.mpi_lock);
err = mlx5_nic_vport_unaffiliate_multiport(mpi->mdev);
......@@ -3332,6 +3330,8 @@ static void mlx5_ib_cleanup_multiport_master(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
mlx5_ib_dbg(dev, "unbinding port_num: %u\n",
i + 1);
mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port(dev, dev->port[i].mp.mpi);
list_add_tail(&dev->port[i].mp.mpi->list,
&mlx5_ib_unaffiliated_port_list);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册