提交 78c3b41b 编写于 作者: P Pavel Begunkov 提交者: Cheng Jian

io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation

mainline inclusion
from mainline-5.6-rc5
commit fc04c39b
category: feature
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.openeuler.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27
CVE: NA
---------------------------

To cancel a work, io-wq sets IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL and executes the
callback. However, IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL works will just execute and may
return next work, which will be ignored and lost.

Cancel the whole link.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
上级 ba32a50b
......@@ -748,6 +748,17 @@ static bool io_wq_can_queue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct,
return true;
}
static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work)
{
do {
struct io_wq_work *old_work = work;
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
work->func(&work);
work = (work == old_work) ? NULL : work;
} while (work);
}
static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wqe, work);
......@@ -761,8 +772,7 @@ static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
* It's close enough to not be an issue, fork() has the same delay.
*/
if (unlikely(!io_wq_can_queue(wqe, acct, work))) {
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
work->func(&work);
io_run_cancel(work);
return;
}
......@@ -901,8 +911,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_cb_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
work->func(&work);
io_run_cancel(work);
return IO_WQ_CANCEL_OK;
}
......@@ -977,8 +986,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
work->func(&work);
io_run_cancel(work);
return IO_WQ_CANCEL_OK;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册