提交 786a2aa2 编写于 作者: J Jarkko Sakkinen

Revert commit e918e570 ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102")

Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis
and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a
remark about a bug caused by commit 93e1b7d4 ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID
module parameter").

Fixes: e918e570 ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102")
Reported-by: NPeter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
上级 e918e570
......@@ -235,9 +235,17 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev,
return tpm_tis_init(&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info);
}
/*
* There is a known bug caused by 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID module
* parameter"). This commit added IFX0102 device ID, which is also used by
* tpm_infineon but ignored to add quirks to probe which driver ought to be
* used.
*/
static struct pnp_device_id tpm_pnp_tbl[] = {
{"PNP0C31", 0}, /* TPM */
{"ATM1200", 0}, /* Atmel */
{"IFX0102", 0}, /* Infineon */
{"BCM0101", 0}, /* Broadcom */
{"BCM0102", 0}, /* Broadcom */
{"NSC1200", 0}, /* National */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册