tcp: fix a stale ooo_last_skb after a replace
When skb replaces another one in ooo queue, I forgot to also update tp->ooo_last_skb as well, if the replaced skb was the last one in the queue. To fix this, we simply can re-use the code that runs after an insertion, trying to merge skbs at the right of current skb. This not only fixes the bug, but also remove all small skbs that might be a subset of the new one. Example: We receive segments 2001:3001, 4001:5001 Then we receive 2001:8001 : We should replace 2001:3001 with the big skb, but also remove 4001:50001 from the queue to save space. packetdrill test demonstrating the bug 0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3 +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0 +0 listen(3, 1) = 0 +0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7> +0.100 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1024 +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4 +0.01 < . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1 win 1024 +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1 <nop,nop, sack 1001:2001> +0.01 < . 1001:3001(2000) ack 1 win 1024 +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1 <nop,nop, sack 1001:2001 1001:3001> Fixes: 9f5afeae ("tcp: use an RB tree for ooo receive queue") Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Cc: Yaogong Wang <wygivan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录