提交 7644143c 编写于 作者: M Mike Waychison 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] x86_64: Fix mce_log

The attempt to fixup the lockless mce log buffer introduced an infinite loop
when trying to find a free entry.

And:

Using rcu_dereference() to load mcelog.next doesn't seem to be sufficient
enough to ensure that mcelog.next is loaded each time around the loop in
mce_log().  Instead, use an explicit rmb() to ensure that the compiler gets it
right.

AK: turned the smp_wmbs into true wmbs to make sure they are not
reordered by the compiler on UP.
Signed-off-by: NMike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 7d318d77
...@@ -54,9 +54,12 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce) ...@@ -54,9 +54,12 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce)
{ {
unsigned next, entry; unsigned next, entry;
mce->finished = 0; mce->finished = 0;
smp_wmb(); wmb();
for (;;) { for (;;) {
entry = rcu_dereference(mcelog.next); entry = rcu_dereference(mcelog.next);
/* The rmb forces the compiler to reload next in each
iteration */
rmb();
for (;;) { for (;;) {
/* When the buffer fills up discard new entries. Assume /* When the buffer fills up discard new entries. Assume
that the earlier errors are the more interesting. */ that the earlier errors are the more interesting. */
...@@ -69,6 +72,7 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce) ...@@ -69,6 +72,7 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce)
entry++; entry++;
continue; continue;
} }
break;
} }
smp_rmb(); smp_rmb();
next = entry + 1; next = entry + 1;
...@@ -76,9 +80,9 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce) ...@@ -76,9 +80,9 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce)
break; break;
} }
memcpy(mcelog.entry + entry, mce, sizeof(struct mce)); memcpy(mcelog.entry + entry, mce, sizeof(struct mce));
smp_wmb(); wmb();
mcelog.entry[entry].finished = 1; mcelog.entry[entry].finished = 1;
smp_wmb(); wmb();
if (!test_and_set_bit(0, &console_logged)) if (!test_and_set_bit(0, &console_logged))
notify_user = 1; notify_user = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册